My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01914
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01914
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/4/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />of doing what he needs to do. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Well. our attorney may overrule me. but I don't think <br />we have any enforcement powers in this board. If the guidelines are <br />then adopted by the legislature in the form of new statutes that is <br />another ball game. As I see it. the guidelines are literally what the <br />word implies. We have no authority to go further than to issue them. <br />So maybe after this meeting you might discuss with Mr. Moses or Mr. <br />Sparks anything further to elaborate on. That would be my interpre- <br />tation of where we stand. <br /> <br />Mr. Blatchley: I really am not talking about the enforcement by your <br />board or the legislature. When something comes from a state agency <br />down to a county or city. too often a guideline becomes the regulation <br />or the law of the land in that particular county or city. This. by <br />experience. has been a real problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: What you are saying is that they might not do their <br />homeworK and just rely on something that has been put out. and that <br />then becomes the ordinance of the city involved. Is that it? <br /> <br />Mr. Blatchley: That is it very precisely. That is why we do not take <br />guidelines so lightly. We are trying to get this clarified before they <br />do become law in some of the counties throughout the state. <br /> <br />own <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: <br /> <br />If you would like to explore it further <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />Mr. Blatchlev: When I say law. I do not mean statutory law, but county <br />regulations. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: All right. thank you very much. Ron. Are there any <br />others that would like to speak on this agenda item at this time? <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher: I have a question of Larry. On the definition here under <br />low hazard zone where you limit the height of the flood to one foot. <br />let's say under eight and the product of that times the velocity <br />becomes 3. what would be the situation where you might have a flood of <br />say a tenth of an inch. and when you divide that into three you might <br />have a velocity of thirty feet per second? <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: This is one of the things you get into by using a product. <br />If. in tact, you get a velocity of say thirty feet per second it is <br />because your depth is considered. The friction alone of the ground <br />will not permit a shallow depth to flow at a great rate. There will <br />not be much variation between the relation as we have shown here. <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher: Well, asa mathematician it bothers me a little bit and <br />it bothers me particularly under section (b) where you might let' s ~':., <br />say have a depth of 3 or 4 feet, and then you get into a product stifl <br />of a very high velocity. I am a little disturbed by this. You are . <br />not putting a limit on the velocity. <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: This is true. mathematically you can come up with this. <br /> <br />-60- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.