Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to all jurisdictions. But matters of present development. projected <br />uses and other matters within each community make it difficult to <br />write an ordinance which is applicable to everyone. We have considered <br />that at the local level they would make changes to suit their case. <br />However. if they make changes which are basically opposed to what is in <br />the guidelines. then we would advise the Land Use Commission. For <br />instance. the statute is specific that you cannot delineate as flood <br />hazard areas anything greater than that area which would be covered by I <br />an intermediate regional flood. or the so-called one hundred year flood. <br />That we think no local jurisdiction can do. There are certain other <br />things which we think they cannot do. We know they have some discretion <br />in things like penalties, procedure and perhaps even in the use of the <br />so-called fringe areas or low hazard areas. although we are not so sure <br />that that is not a substantive matter. <br /> <br />In any event. this has to be a living thing. We cannot simply adopt a <br />regulation today and say it is going to apply for all future time. <br />We must follow it through the future history of the state of Colorado <br />and recommend such changes from time.to time as actual experience <br />dictates. Actual experience will dictate that some changes be made. <br />This is intended to be a starting point only. Whatever this board <br />adopts will apply until it is changed. I am sure that the audience and <br />the board members realize that we reserve jurisdiction to make changes <br />in this as time and experience dictate. <br /> <br />I was informed by the Governor's office a few days ago that a task force <br />has been put together under the direction of Senator Bermingham which <br />is attempting to prepare a model form, not the substance, but the form <br />of these various regulations. So we may have to.make this conform to <br />that model form in the future. <br /> <br />In addition. the statutes are being recodified and the revised new <br />statutes will be issued very shortly. Any present statutory references <br />will be obsolete after the new statutes are issued, which is now <br />anticipated for January. They will be called the 1973 revised statutes. <br />An entirely new format is being employed in the revision of those <br />statutes. It will probably be sometime in February before the work of <br />the Governor's committee is finished. We will have the new statutes <br />probably in January. In February we wiil issue this proposed regulation <br />in final form. The purpose of this meeting today is to debate the <br />substantive issues of the proposal. <br /> <br />I might point out to the board that in these many letters there were <br />some very searching analyses made of this regulation. We were a little <br />disappointed that we didn't get greater input. but the people who did I <br />send us letters have done considerable research. This regulation will <br />affect thousands of acres of land within the state of Colorado. much <br />of which is in private ownership. It can be expected to be controver- <br />sial. <br /> <br />The main thrust of much of the comments was directed to what can be <br />done in a floodplain. There were some important changes that we made <br />as a result of the suggestions. The main difference of opinion was <br />what you do in the floodplain, and particularly in what we define as <br /> <br />-47- <br />