My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01887
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01887
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/16/2004
Description
Summary Minutes and Record of Decisions - November 19-21, 2004
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br /> <br />-10 - <br /> <br />20. Stream and Lake Protection and Flood Section - Request for Approval of Policy <br />regarding RlCDs. <br />Tape 2, Track 1 1 :02:20 - 2:37:30 <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />A motion was made by Harold Miskel with a second by Carolyn McIntosh to <br />approve staffrecommendation to adopt the proposed Recreational In-Channel <br />Diversion Policy regarding teclmical criteria with any changes deemed <br />appropriate as a result of public comments made at the workshop and at the <br />CWCB meeting. The following additional language will also be included at <br />the end ofthe "Hydraulic Engineering Definition of Control" section of the <br />policy, located on page 5 of the proposed policy: <br />"The CWCB's definition of hydraulic control applies to at least one man- <br />made structure within an existing or proposed stream reach that is the subject <br />of an RICD water right. It is recommended that hydraulic structures should <br />capture and control the entire streamflow for the RICD flow rate, or range of <br />flow rates, requested by the applicant. For example, if a proposed RICD <br />stream reach is 900 feet long and contains 7 hydraulic structures, at least one <br />of the structures should capture and control the RlCD stream flow for the <br />intended recreational use. The CWCB suggests that an inconsistency with the <br />requirements ofSB 01-216 would result if control ofthe RlCD flow, as <br />defined above, does not occur." Motion was approved 9-0. Greg Walcher <br />was not present. <br /> <br />21. Attorney General's Report and Legal Briefing . <br />Tape 2 Track 1 2:37:30 - 2:49:30 <br />Action: A motion was made by Carolyn Mcintosh with a second by Harold Miskel to <br />go into Executive Session to discuss the following Agenda items: <br />22a. NPS Quantification of Black Canyon Rreserved Right, Case No. 4- <br />W437. <br />22b. Proposed Purchase and Donation of Water Right for Instream Flows <br />22d. Gunnison River Federal ISF Application <br />22e. Discussion ofIssues re: Gunnison RICD Litigation <br />Motion was approved 8-0. Greg Walcher was not present. Eric Wilkinson <br />recused himself from discussionof 22e. <br /> <br />22. Executive Session <br />Under advisement oflegal counsel, this session was not be recorded due to attorney/client <br />privileges. <br /> <br />23. Report from Executive Session <br />Tape 2, Track 2 0-4:10 <br />Action: A motion was made by Carolyn McIntosh with a second by Don Schwindt to <br />direct the Attorney General to take necessary action on items 22a,b,d,e. <br />Motion was ap r ved 9-0. Greg Walcher was not present. <br /> <br />Director's Reports - , DO , CWCB, SEO, DOW, WRPDA <br />Tape 2, Track 2 4:10 - 37:40 <br /> <br />Action: Information item. No formal action taken. <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Prot~tion <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.