My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01883
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:23 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/28/2003
Description
Flood Section - Request for Approval of Policy Regarding RICD's
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. The lowest RSFR that should normally be considered is 50 cfs. If passage of <br />rafts or larger craft is precluded by factors other than flow rate, and floatable <br />debris is not an issue, then the RSFR could be lowered to 30 cfs. . <br />. For Passage Oriented RICDs, the maximum RSFR should normally be considered <br />to be in the range of 50-100 cfs. <br />. For Destination Oriented RICDs, the RSFR s~ould be no larger than the monthly' <br />mean flow rate during the intended period of use, up to a maximum range of 250 <br />to 500 cfs. If an application for an RICD seeks a flow rate for more than 250 <br />cfs, they must demonstrate why a higher flow rate is necessary for that <br />particular boating course. <br /> <br />These criteria are based, in part, on experiences that exist at "pay for" courses. At <br />"pay for" courses, presumably, the recreators are having a reasonable recreational <br />experience because they are willing to pay for the experience. These criteria are <br />based, in part, on a survey of boating courses throughout the world. See the Appendix. <br />These criteria are also based, in part, on the experts' opinions in designing boating <br />courSes throughout the country. These criteria reflect the water flow rates that have <br />been obtained for every whitewater course in Colorado (except for the Golden <br />whitewater course which exceeds these flow rate~). Moreover, these criteria also <br />reflect the surveys taken regarding the Golden and Gunnison whitewater courses. <br />These surveys determined that a quality recreational experience is obtained at those . <br />courses at the flow ranges stated above. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.