My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01880
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:21 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/1/1982
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />< <br /> <br />3. Federal water resources planning is to be responsive tc State and <br />local concerns. Accordingly, state and local participation is to be <br />encouraged in all aspects of water resources planning. Federal <br />agencies are to contact GovernorS or designated State agencies for <br />each affected State before initiating studies, and to provide <br />appropriate opportunities for State participation. It is recognized, <br />however, that water projects which are local, regional, statewide, or <br />even interstate in scope do not necessarily require a major role for <br />the Federal governmentl non-Federal, voluntary arrangements between <br />affected jurisdictions may often be adequate. States and localities <br />are free to initiate planning and implementation of water projects. <br /> <br />4. Federal water resources plannin9 is to take into account international <br />implications, including treaty obligations. Timely consultations with <br />the relevant foreign.government should be undertaken when a federal <br />water project is likely to have a significant impact on any land or <br />resources within its territorial boundaries. <br /> <br />5. Various alternative plans are to be formulated in a systematic manner <br />to insure that all reasonable alternatives are evaluated. <br /> <br />(a) A plan that reasonably maximizes net national economic develop- <br />ment (NED) benefits, consistent with the Federal objective, is to <br />be formulated. This plan is to be identified as the NED plan. <br />(b) Other plans which reduce net NED benefits in order to further <br />address other Federal, State, local, and international concerns <br />not fully addressed by the NED plan may be formulated. <br />(c) Plans may be formulated which require changes in existing <br />statutes, administrative regulations, and established common <br />lawl such required changes are to be identified. <br />(d) Each alternative plan formulated is to be efficient and <br />effectivel and appropriate mitigation of adverse effects is to <br />be an integral part of each alternative plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.