My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01872
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01872
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/27/1999
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Interior Department's Indian Water Rights Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT -- August 11, 1999 <br /> <br />how the alternative will be consistent with the Department's <br />trust responsibility. <br /> <br />Recommendation 3.e.: When FWS enters formal consultation on <br />an action by any Interior Department agency, which may either <br />enable an Indian tribe to exercise its water rights or may result <br />in significant adverse impacts to the exercise of Indian water <br />rights, the FWS should treat an affected Indian tribe as a full <br />participant in the consultation process. <br /> <br />EXPLANATION: This Recommendation is in response to requests by <br />tribes for a recommendation to establish a peer review process <br />for certain FWSactions under Section 7. It builds on the <br />concept set forth in Subsections 3(C) (3) (a) and (b) of the Appen- <br />dix to S.O. 3206 regarding involvement of a tribe in the Section <br />7 process. The Secretarial Order allows tribes to participate <br />fully in Section 7 consultations where BIA is the action agency, <br />to participate through the BIA where another Interior bureau is <br />the action agency, and where a non-Interior agency is the action <br />agency, Interior would encourage the action agency to include the <br />BIA and affected tribe in the consultation. Implementation of <br />this Recommendation would allow tribal biologists to participate <br />in the scientific process and would include invitations to meet- <br />ings between the FWS and federal action agency, opportunities to <br />provide pertinent scientific data and to review data in the <br />administrative record, and to review biological assessments and <br />draft biological opinions provided by the action agency. <br /> <br />Recommendation 3.D.: During ESA Section 7 consultation in <br />river basins where there are Indian water rights, the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service should develop staff capability to understand <br />Indian water issues, and, in conjunction with the action agency, <br />should utilize the services of attorneys from the Office of the <br />Solicitor and the expertise of officials of other agencies to <br />insure proper consideration of Indian water rights. <br /> <br />EXPLANATION: Because of the complexity of Indian water right <br />issues and the fact that they are often the subject of <br />litigation, FWS should develop its own expertise and take maximum <br />advantage of the other existing expertise from within the <br />Department. The Office of the Solicitor, as well as the Bureau <br />of Indian Affairs and other agencies, has expertise that could be <br />utilized to assure that appropriate consideration to the tribal <br />interests is provided. <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />.-...... "'-:.~-~ - > <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.