My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01872
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01872
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/27/1999
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Interior Department's Indian Water Rights Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT -- August 11, 1999 <br /> <br />50 CFR 402.14(g)(3) and (4). "Effects of the action" in turn requires the longest definition in <br /> <br />the Section 7 regulations, and the expression "environmental baseline" is found therein: <br /> <br />Effects of the action refers to the direct and indirect effects of an action on the species <br />or critical habitat, together with the effects of other activities that are interrelated or <br />interdependent with that action, that will be added to the environmental baseline. The <br />environmental baseline includes the past and present impacts of all Federal, State, <br />or private actions and other human activities on the action area, the anticipated <br />impacts of all proposed Federal projects in the action area that have already <br />undergone formal or early section 7 consultation, and the impact of State or <br />private actions which are contemporaneous with the consultation process. Indirect <br />effects are those that are caused by the proposed action and are later in time, but still <br />are reasonably certain to occur. Interrelated actions are those that are part of a larger <br />action and depend on the larger action for their justification. Interdependent actions <br />are those that have no independent utility apart from the action under consideration. <br /> <br />50 CFR 402.02. The baseline is supposed to be a snapshot that depicts the current status of <br />the species as the consultation commences. Under the regulation it includes the impacts of <br />past and present actions, plus any future federal actions which have already undergone Section <br />7 consultation. There is no question that the determination of the baseline is intended to be <br />an objective and factual exercise. This is understandably important to the Service to assure <br />that the scientific nature of its biological inquiry is maintained. <br /> <br />Where depletion of the waters of a stream is an environmental effect of the project, and that <br /> <br /> <br />depletion may adversely affect listed species in the action area, the environmental baseline <br /> <br />usually takes on the appearance of an inventory of water uses, not unlike a list of water right <br /> <br /> <br />holders from first priority to last-- except that unexercised Indian water rights (and some <br /> <br /> <br />unexercised non-Indian water rights) are not included. Sometimes gauge readings are used; <br /> <br />sometimes lists of state-permitted and adjudicated water rights are used, whether or not those <br /> <br />rights have been exercised in the recent past; sometimes both methods are used. The baseline <br /> <br /> <br />is largely drawn from information provided by the action agency, e.g., the Bureau of <br /> <br />Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (There <br /> <br /> <br />appear to have been inconsistencies in the way those agencies and the Service have calculated <br /> <br /> <br />baseline depletion effects in Western streams, apart from their treatment of Indian water <br /> <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.