My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01872
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01872
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/27/1999
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Interior Department's Indian Water Rights Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT -- August 11, 1999 <br /> <br />To implement Section 7, FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) <br />promulgated regulations that established a process for Federal agencies to consult on the <br />biological impacts of their proposed projects on listed species. Under the regulations Federal <br />agencies must assess the biological impacts of their proposed action(s) on listed species. The <br />action agencies must describe a baseline of e){isting activities that are affecting the listed <br />species and compare these against the impacts of their proposed action. Based on the ESA <br />regulations and a 1981 Solicitor's Opinion, the agencies have not attempted to estimate <br />potential impacts on endangered species of ooknown, yet potential activities by others, <br />including future development of water development projects by Native Americans, even when <br />Native Americans' water rights are senior to those of the interests developing a project on <br />which the action agency and FWS are consulting. Unlike water rights perfected under state <br />law, Indian water rights are not subject to forfeiture due to non-use, and thus may be <br />exercised in the future while retaining their senior priority. However, as a practical and <br />political matter, when a stream system is fully appropriated, it becomes virtually impossible <br />for an Indian tribe to develop its water resources. <br /> <br />Therein lies the dilemma before the United States Govemment and the tribes-- how to protect <br /> <br /> <br />tribes' water rights and conserve endangered species in systems which have been over-utilized <br /> <br />and over-appropriated to the point that species have had to be declared endangered or <br /> <br /> <br />threatened and where unchecked further water development may lead to their extinction. <br /> <br />By memorandum of June 9, 1997, the Secretary directed the Working Group to evaluate this <br />process, including the criteria for the development of environmental baselines. This is the <br />principal focus of our Report and Recommendations. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.