Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />the Animas-La Plata Project, Case No. 01 CW 54, which CPA also opposes. Oral argument on <br />CPA's motions attacking the original decrees is scheduled for August 20. <br /> <br />7. Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado, United States Supreme Court, No. 126, Original. <br /> <br />The U.S. Supreme Court adopted the parties' settlement. On July 1, the states agreed on a <br />ground water model for compact administration. At the Republican River Compact <br />Administration meeting on August 21 & 22, the Compact Administration will formally adopt the <br />model, the Special Master will report that to the Supreme Court, and the case will be dismissed. <br />Colorado then has through 2007 to ensure its uses, as partially determined by the model, are in <br />compliance with the Compact. <br /> <br />8. Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park Reserved Rights Case, No. W-437, Water <br />Division 4. <br /> <br />The State and representatives of the National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, and the <br />Fish and Wildlife Service signed an agreement on April 2. As you know, the Board is an integral <br />part of that agreement through its instream flow appropriation. The AGO, Board staff, and Kent <br />Holsinger have negotiated a proposed enforcement agreement for the instream flow with the US. <br />The Board must act on the enf6rcement agreement this meeting to meet the August 2 <br />deadline set out iu the April 2 agreement. In the pending United States case, the United States <br />moved to amend its application to claim only 300 cfs. Land and Water Fund, Trout Unlimi!ed, <br />and others filed a brief opposing the amendment as prejudicial to them. The AGO is worki.i\g <br />with other water users to prepare a response supporting the amendment. The Board members <br />may wish to discuss both the pending case and the Board's anticipated enforcement with .> <br />counsel in executive session. .... <br /> <br />9. Application of City of Central (Case No. 92CW168) <br /> <br />Assistant Attorneys General Lori Coulter and John Cyran represented the Board at the trial in <br />this case held in May 2003. We still are awaiting the Court's ruling. <br /> <br />10. Application of Town of Breckenridge (Case No. 97CW283) <br /> <br />The court approved a stipulation between the Town and the CWCB on June 17, 2003. In <br />the midst of a one-day trial held on July 2, 2003, the State arid Division Engineers and the Town <br />entered into a stipulation. The final decree entered by the Court on July 17, 2003 was for a 1997 <br />conditional water right of 2cfsout of Miners Creek with an appropriation date of May 18, 1995 <br />to be used to increase exchange potential on the Blue River. Because the water right may only <br />be diverted from Miners Creek when it is in priority on Miners Creek, there will be no injury to <br />the CWCB's 1986 instream flow water right on Miners Creek. <br /> <br />11. Application of City of Longmont (Case No. 02CW275) <br /> <br />Subsequent to the Supreme Court ruling in the Golden, Breckenridge and Eagle River <br />Water and Sanitation appeals, the CWCB staff, in consultation with the Applicant, filed a request <br />in the water court for an extension of time for the CWCB to submit its findings and <br />recommendation to January 2004. We are awaiting the court's ruling on this request. <br />