Laserfiche WebLink
<br />j'lt <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />9. Colorado has no objections to the report of the <br />Secretary of the Interior on participating projects <br />except that Colorado urges that further study be given <br />to the La Plata Project, which is urgently needed, in <br />order to develop, if possible, a feasible plan therefor <br />and except as hereinafter noted. <br /> <br />10. The report and the Supplemental Report of the <br />Secretary of th~ Interior practically ignores any <br />development of Colorado River System water in Colo- <br />rado. For this reason, Colorado cannot accept the <br />report and supplemental report as now submitted. As <br />conditions precedent to Colorado approval of the report, <br />provisions must be made therein, or in the authorizing <br />legislation, which will assure the following water de- <br />velopment in Colorado: <br /> <br />(a) T!1e Cross Mountain unit mw>t be included within <br />the initial authorization for construction as a part <br />of the first phase of the project. <br /> <br />(b) There is no doubt that further consumptive use <br />of water in Colorado is directly dependent upon high <br />upstream storage. To provide therefor there must be <br />included in the initial authorization approximately <br />3,000,000 acre-feet of total new storage on the <br />Colorado River and its tributaries above Grand <br />Junction, Colorado, a substantial portion of which <br />shall be located on the upper reaches of the Gun- <br />nison River. The known reservoir sites which might <br />accomplish this objective are Curecanti on the Gun- <br />nison and DeBeque on the Colorado River. Additional <br />investigations may disclose other sites. There is <br />little doubt but that the stated amount of storage <br />will be needed. The Secretary of the Interior is <br />urged to expedite the investigation and study of <br />projects which will furnish the requested storage. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />11. Denver, the capitol city of Colorado, desires to <br />divert water from the Blue River, a tributary of the <br />Colorado River, for use for municipal and industrial <br />purposes in the metropolitar. Denver area. The rights <br />of Denver to take and divert such water are alleged to <br />be in conflict with rights for the use of water stored <br />in Green Mountain Reservoir and taken through the Green <br />Mountain power plant for the generation of power. Green <br />Mountain Dam, Reservoir and Power Plant constitute a unit <br />of the Colorado-Big-Thompson Project of the United States <br />Bureau of Reclamation. The controversy over the relative <br />rights of Denver and the Green Mountain Project are in <br />litigation in a law suit now pending in the Supreme <br />Court of the State of Colorado and in another law suit <br />now pending in the United States District Court for the <br />District of Colorado. It would be improper for this <br />Board to attempt to invade the process of the courts <br />