My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01816
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:07:40 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:02:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/19/2001
Description
CF Section - Proposed Statute Revisions Construction Fund and Severance Tax Trust Fund Perpetual Base Account
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Section 37-60-121 (2.5)(a), CRS, created the Litigation Fund (Account) in the <br />Construction Fund, <br /> <br />Currently, the Board is only authorized to spend up to $4,0 million from the Litigation <br />Fund for litigation in support of water users whose water supply yield may be diminished as a <br />result of by, pass flow requirements, or to oppose federal applications for instream flows, <br /> <br />The funds in the account have never been spent op. litigation, but $1 million dollars of the <br />original $4 million was transferred to the Native Species Conservation Trust Fund pursuant to SB <br />99-173, leaving a current balance in the fund of $3 million, <br /> <br />The intent of the revisions is to continuously make available a $3 million pool of funds to <br />the Board to avoid, prevent, or defend against future litigation directed toward the water users of <br />the state, <br /> <br />, <br />The proposed revision also expands the use of the Litigation Fund to include expenditures <br />relative to more general questions of law and regulation, The funds could be used for outside <br />litigation support, retention of experts, operating costs, and other general costs associated with <br />investigating the impacts federal or state regulatory processes may have on the state and its water <br />users, <br /> <br />For example, we spent operating funds on outside experts in the Golden case, We also <br />spent funds preparing our proposed monitoring plan that helped avoid litigation during the recent <br />Snowmass Creek 404 permitting discussions, The State Engineer is also always involved in <br />litigation of a statewide importance, We believe that because the Attorney General is a member <br />of our Board and we are constantly collaborating to address issues of law and the challenges <br />presented by lawsuits and regulations, that a framework exists to ensure the prudent expenditure <br />of funds more expeditiously, We also do not believe it is in the best interest of the state or water <br />users to wait until the Attorney General is out of funds' before being able to take advantage of the <br />Litigation Fund, ' <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.