Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />which are not always in areas affected by the minerals and mining industries. In addition, the CWCB needs to develop its <br />own gaging program to address program specific missions. <br /> <br />In November 1999, the DWR requested $235,000 from the Construction Fund for the FY 00-01 Satellite <br />Monitoring System. This request was for the seventh year of a ten-year program to replace 150 Data Collection <br />Platforms (DCPs). Each year since 1993, the construction fund paid for 15 sets of electronic'equipment and provided <br />$35,000 for gaging station refurbishment, at a total cost of $120,000. The requested increase in 1999 resulted from an <br />expanded system that now encompasses approximately 300 DCPs at various locations throughout the state, including 60 <br />gages located on irrigation ditches. In addition, new technology, which will ttltimately increase reliability and real time <br />data transmission rates, requires the DWR to upgrade its older outdated DCPs over the next 10 years. Eventually, these <br />older DCPs will not meet the requirements imposed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) <br />which operates the satellite used by the DWR. <br /> <br />At its November 1999 Board Meeting, the CWCB did not approve a $235,000 funding request by DWR and <br />instead requested the General Assembly to authorize $120,000 to be appropriated for the Satellite Monitoring System <br />from the General Fttnd. This was the same funding amount that had been approved in the previous seven years. The <br />Board and CWCB staff were reluctant to approve the requested increase until alternatives to providing for the increased <br />costs could be further researched. It was also suggested that this important program be funded through a legislative <br />appropriation from the Long Bill. <br /> <br />In June 2000, the DWR prepared a decision item with support from the CWCB to fund the DWR Satellite <br />Monitoring System refurbishment program using General Funds. Unfortunately, the Department of Natural Resources <br />was unable to give the proposed decision item a high priority and instructed the CWCB and DWR to work cooperatively <br />and seek funding for the improvements through the annttal Projects Bill. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />The CWCB's proposed Gaging Program is currently under development. It is a collaborative effort between the <br />Board's Flood Protection section, Stream and Lake protection section and Water Supply protection section, as well as th.... <br />DWR, USGS and other stakeholders. To develop the program, each section will need to address a variety of issues and. <br />develop long term goals. Following is a section-by-section breakdown of issues and goals that will be addressed in the <br />development of a ttnified five year gaging plan: <br /> <br />Flood Protection Program <br /> <br />. Identify gages that should be "flood hardened" so floodplain warning systems, forecasting, and long-term hydrologic <br />records can remain in tact during high flow events. <br /> <br />. Develop construction, equipment, and operating criteria for flood hardening gages. <br /> <br />. Identify areas that would benefit from the development of new flood warning systems and coordinate with local <br />communities to develop, operate and maintain systems that will resttlt in savings to life and property. <br /> <br />Stream and Lake Protection <br /> <br />. Develop a process to identify streams where instream flow rights are likely to be senior enough to impact <br />administration of water rights and a prioritization of those streams to determjne gaging needs for efficient <br />administration. <br /> <br />. Develop construction, equipment, and operating criteria for gages related to low flow and winter measurements that <br />are affected by icing conditions. <br /> <br />. Develop a Low Flow Warning System, to provide near real-time information on the occurrence of flows which <br />approach ISF amounts. An automated system will free up staff resources and provide a more focused response in <br />instances where the ISF rights may need to be administered in priority. <br /> <br />. Maintain and acquire gaging, computer, mapping tools and equipment to efficiently manage raw data and data _ <br />collection efforts for instream flow monitoring and enforcement. .. <br />