Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l <br /> <br />4. Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Tribes' Settlement. Case Nos, 7-W-1603-76F & _ <br />76J, 02-CW-85, & 02-CW-86. _ <br /> <br />These cases involve conforming the Tribes' water rights, settled through consent decrees in <br />1991, to the final configuration of the Animas-La Plata Project. The state has filed pleadings in <br />support of the applications, Citizens' Progressive Alliance is the only active objector. The water <br />judge has now ruled on a number oflegal motions, striking or denying many of CPA's legal <br />contentions, We filed motions for summary judgment in September, which we hope will dispose <br />of CPA's objections, CPA also filed a motion for swnmary judgment, relying on its theory that <br />the Ute Tribes do not have any reserved water rights because of an old Supreme Court decision, <br /> <br />5. Black Canvon of the Gunnison National Park Reserved Ril!hts Case, No, W-437. Water <br />Division 4. <br /> <br />The state water court case remains stayed, The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion <br />on our petition for review of the water court's stay order on November 8, refusing to lift the <br />water court's stay, That means we will have to await resolution of the environmental objectors' <br />federal action before quantification can proceed in state water court, In the federal action, the <br />federal district court judge denied the United States' motion to dismiss, which we had joined, <br />The United States has produced the administrative record, which is 14,000 pages long. The <br />environmental plaintiffs in the federal case are nevertheless seeking disclosure of additional <br />documents to "supplement" the record, and have asked the court for permission to make <br />document production requests from the state as well, We have opposed the request, and a <br />hearing on the motions is set for December 3, <br /> <br />6. CWCB ISF Application on Gunnison River throul!h the Black Canvon (Case No. <br />03CW265). <br /> <br />Nothing new to report, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7, Trout Unlimited v. Department of Al!riculture/Okanol!an County v. National Marine <br />Fisheries Service. <br /> <br />Last spring, the federal district court for Colorado ruled against the Forest Service, Colorado, <br />Greeley and Water Supply & Storage Co, in this case, The case arose from Trout Unlimited's <br />challenge to the FS decision not to impose bypass flows on Long Draw Reservoir, located at the <br />headwaters of the Cache la Poudre River. On cross motions for summary judgment, the judge <br />ruled against TU on most of its challenges, but nevertheless found that the FS decision to allow <br />1.2 miles of stream to be dewatered was arbitrary and capricious and a violation of the Federal <br />Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA). We had joined with the water users in arguing that <br />the FS could not impose bypass flows under FLPMA, because of the potential for disruption of <br />hundreds of water diversion and storage structures located on national forest lands, in <br />conjunction with Greeley and Water Supply and Storage Company, we filed a notice of appeal <br />on August 18th. Shortly afterward, the Forest Service and then Trout Unlimited also filed <br />appeals, which have been consolidated for briefing, Our opening brief is due November 22. The <br />lOth Circuit required the parties to participate in a mediation conference on October 13. The <br />Board may wish to discuss this further in executive session. <br /> <br />8. Green Mountain ReservoirlHeenev landslide case. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br />