Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br /><' <br />, <br />- <br /> <br />Unda Bassi <br /> <br />January 4, 2005 <br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br /> <br />Page 32 <br />A. Do you mean -- when you say a number, do you mean <br /> <br />a flow? <br /> <br />Q. Flow rate. <br /> <br />A. In that reach of stream during the winter greater <br /> <br />5 than 22 CFS would that be more than the minimum needed? <br /> <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br /> <br />Q. <br />A. <br /> <br />Yes. <br /> <br />Yes. <br />Is it the intent of the Colorado Water <br /> <br />Q. <br /> <br />9 Conservation Board to shift the burden of the measurement <br />10 condition of its decrees onto the applicant? <br /> <br />11 <br />12 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />No. <br /> <br />Q. <br /> <br />Could you turn to the proposed decree, Deposition <br /> <br />Exhibit 2, I think it is. <br />A. I've got my copy. <br /> <br />Q. <br /> <br />I direct your attention to (8) (d) as in dog, the <br /> <br />second sentence. You are familiar with that sentence? <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Yes, I am. <br /> <br />Q. <br /> <br />Why is that sentence objectionable to the Colorado <br /> <br />19 Water Conservation Board if the intent is not to shift the <br />20 burden of its measurement condition onto the applicant? <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />I believe that it's superfluous language ~n a <br /> <br />22 water court decree for the applicant's water rights. This <br /> <br />23 decree can't modify the in-stream flow decrees. <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />Q. <br /> <br />Without that second sentence would.you agree that <br /> <br />25 someone not familiar with the intent of the Colorado Water <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Esquire Depositon Services <br />Phone 303.316.0330 <br /> <br />3400 E. Bayaud, Suite 480 <br /> <br />Denver, Co. 80209 <br />Fax 303.3]6.0350 <br />3d77c6cc.5B6f-43e1-8eb2-12be4345e06' <br />