My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01741
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01741
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/20/1955
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:7 <br />.274 <br /> <br />state that I have reviewed in a preliminary fashion <br />the preliminary design of the dam and its appurtenance <br />and, in my opinion, it is the best and most economical <br />type of structure that could be built at the Wago~ Wheel <br />Gap site to provide a reservoir with a capacity of 500,000 <br />acre-feet. There may be some questions concerning the <br />capacity of the outlet works and sluiceways. <br /> <br />Under the 1955 version of the project, three' of <br />the Fish and Wildlife Service's recommendations would <br />not be strictly complied .with. Minimum flows would <br />not be guaranteed in the amount of 6Q" seconcf.:feet for the <br />winter months as recommended by the Se~vice; the only <br />period when such flows would be available would be when <br />flood water is being vacated from the reservoir. rhe <br />Fish and Wildlife Service also recommended the acquisition <br />of 1900 acres of land for a big game winter range, and the <br />provision of 8000 acre-feet of Rio Grande water a~nually <br />for the Monte Vista National Wildlife Development. The <br />Bureau's report does not contemplate that either of <br />these recommendations would be complied with. Th~re <br />appears in the Bureau's report the following significant <br />statement: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"In this connection, it is pertinent that <br />the flows of the Rio Grande are fully <br />appropriated and construction of Wagon. <br />Wheel Gap Reservoir would not create any <br />new water supplies which could be <br />assigned to fish and wildlife uses." <br /> <br />. <br />In respect to recreation, the 1955 plan would provide <br />for the development of recreational faqilities at and <br />near the reservoir in accordance with the tentative <br />recommendation of the National Parks Service. <br /> <br />The Bureau's report s~at~s that "At the end of <br />the study (1951) Colorado (under the Rio Grande Compact <br />provisions) .had an accrued credit of 86,900 acre-feet." <br />This statement is subject to some question. The state- <br />ment as made would include the operation of the Conejos. <br />Without the use of any of the 10,000 acre-feet of <br />annual "cushion" provideq for Colorado in the Compact, <br />the operation of Wagon Wheel Gap as contemplated in <br />the report would cause an accrued debit of 97,000 acre- <br />feet at the end of the 27-year study period. It should <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.