My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01732
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01732
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:25 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/20/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: All right, assuming or admitting <br />problem, how much more can this project take on? <br />further requests? Would it be meaningful? What <br />in regard to this project? <br /> <br />that there is an energy <br />Should we make any <br />are those circumstances <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: I don't know that we can make any more meaningful requests <br />because we are now a year ahead of schedule on the priority adopted by <br />this board last year. One of the problems that we are having with the <br />oil shale industry is to actually determine the requirements and where <br />these requirements must be met. We obviously will have a critical prob- <br />lem in the White River area. We will have to take a much further look <br />at the Yellow Jacket project. We may have to consider some rescheduling <br />of priorities. However, at this time the staff is not prepared to <br />recommend any readjustment in the priorities. <br /> <br />Within the ne~t few months we will be contacting and working directly <br />with the companies that have received the leases that have recently been <br />let by the United States in the oil shale area. We have already had <br />some contact with the Colony Company. There are many imponderables and <br />we are not sure at this time that the West Divide is the most critical <br />of the oil shale projects. It will take the balance of this year before <br />we can come up with any firm figures as to where water must be supplied <br />and when. For that reason, we have suggested a board meeting on the <br />oil shale problems to be held this summer in Rifle, at which time we <br />expect to have the representatives from the various companies there, <br />and also allow the board the opportunity to tour the Parachute Creek <br />area where the first development will occur. At this time, I agree that <br />we may have to reschedule priorities, but at this time we are not able <br />to make a definitive recommendation. <br /> <br />Mr. Bernklau: We sure appreciate that, and as long as <br />keep an open mind, we will keep plugging away for it. <br />mention that the West Divide does have a capability of <br />water to an oil shale industry of 120 million barrels. <br />you people will keep us in mind, we will keep plugging <br />this is a calculated guess. We do know the people are <br />into our area. <br /> <br />you folks will <br />I did forget to <br />producing enough <br />So as long as <br />away because <br />already moving <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Let me ask you how you made that estimate of 120 million <br />barrels. I thought the problem was knowing how you recycle the water, <br />and so forth. I am not knowledgeable on that. <br /> <br />Mr. Bernklau: I had an idea you were going to question me on that. <br />Mr. Roland Fischer has put out this projection from his office, and <br />maybe he could give you a little more information on that, if you would <br />like. <br /> <br />-21- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.