My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01713
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/28/2003
Description
CF Section - Tamarisk Control and Eradication Update
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Impact of Tamarisk Infestation on the <br />Water Resources of Colorado <br />May 30, 2003 <br /> <br />4.0 Impacts and Costs of Control and Revegetation <br /> <br />Costs for removal vary depending on the expanse of the infestation, existence of other valuable <br />plant species, and terrain. For aerial helicopter spraying with herbicide the cost is around $200 <br />to $250 per acre (Hart 2003, Lee 2002). For mechanical mulching and herbicide application the <br />cost ranges from $300 (see Appendix B (Tamarisk Coalition 2003)) to $800 per acre (McDaniel <br />2000, Taylor 1998). For hand clearing and herbicide application the cost can range form $1,500 <br />to $5,000 per acre (Tamarisk Coalition 2002). Terrain, access, presence of other native <br />vegetation, etc. all dictate which approach to use. No one approach is right for all situations. The <br />Colorado Department of Agriculture recommends the strategy of Integrated Pest Management <br />that matches the right methods for each situation. Additionally, a new bio-control approach that <br />uses a Chinese leaf beetle is being researched by the U.S. Departments of Interior and <br />Agriculture and may help further to reduce costs (De Loach 2002). <br /> <br />Removal is only part of the cost. Restoration is the other component which is necessary to bring <br />back the right native plants and restore habitat. If the objective is to only kill tamarisk, other <br />invasive noxious weeds will likely take their place if restoration is not part of the effort. <br />Restoration may occur naturally where native plants are still viable or may require specialized <br />efforts to restore the riparian lands. In general, costs may range from $50 to $1,500 per acre. <br /> <br />Taking all the information developed above and using an average cost of tamarisk control and <br />revegetation of$750/acre, 57,000 acres of infestation in 2003, and 170,000 acre-feet of water <br />potentially saved within Colorado, the resulting overall cost for control and reveg:::tation is <br />$43,000,000 or approximately $250 per acre- foot of water resources recovered. If the average <br />costs for tamarisk <fontrol and revegetation are different, the costs will also change. As a <br />reference point, the cost of purchasing senior water rights in the Denver, Colorado area is valued <br />at $4,000 to $12,000 per acre- foot (Franscell 2002). Another reference point is the Colorado <br />River Return Project (aka the Big Straw) that would cost several billion dollars to capture <br />approximately 300,000 acre-feet of water per year (Bender 2003). Looking at it a little <br />differently, the costs of tamarisk control and revegetation prevent the future loss of water as this <br />invasive plant would otherwise spread to a much larger area (see Figures 3 and 12). <br /> <br />Beyond improving the abundance of water, the extremely important side benefits of tamarisk <br />control and riparian restoration are 1) water quality will be enhanced, 2) wildlife habitat will be <br />improved, 3) there will be greater bio-diversity among both plants and animals, and 4) there will <br />be improved conditions for hwnan enjoyment of the river systems. The value of this improved <br />viability of Colorado's river systems is difficult to measure in terms of dollars but is considered <br />to be highly significant. <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.