Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN <br />THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND <br />THE COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT <br /> <br />I, Background: <br /> <br />The primary purpose of the MOU is to implement the Reasonable and Prudent <br />Alternative for Wolford Mountain Reservoir enlargement to offset the <br />likelihood of jeopardy and adverse modification of critical habitat. In <br />January 1988, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior: the Governors <br />of Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah: and the Administrator of the Western Area <br />Power Administration entered into a Cooperative Agreement to implement the <br />Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin, The Cooperative Agreement also established an <br />Implementation Committee to oversee the Recovery Program. The overall goal of <br />the Recovery Program, as stated in the Cooperative Agreement. is to recover <br />and delist four endangered species (the Colorado squawfish. humpback chub. <br />bony tail , and the razorback sucker) while allowing new water development to <br />occur in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Those four fish are referred to as <br />the "endangered Colorado River fishes" in this Memorandum of Understanding. <br /> <br />Two of the principal elements of the Recovery Program are: (a) a process for <br />conducting section 7 consultations in accordance with the Endangered Species <br />Act on the impacts of water depletions to the endangered Colorado squawfish. <br />razorback sucker. humpback chub. and bonytail and their critical habitat; and <br />(b) acquiring water and/or water rights.to provide instream flows in <br />accordance with State laws for the endangered Colorado River fishes. Under <br />the Recovery Program. the depletion impacts of water development projects are <br />offset by: (a) recovery activities partially funded by water projects <br />proponents' financial contribution to the Recovery Program; (b) legal <br />protection of instream flows under State law; and (c) progress in all other <br />Recovery Program elements. <br /> <br />Accordingly. the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service has decided that it must <br />determine that progress under the Recovery Program is sufficient to offset <br />impacts of a depletion project before it will issue a favorable Biological <br />Opinion, In cases where progress is not sufficient the Service identifies <br />actions in the Recovery Implementation Program Recovery Action Plan to serve <br />as the reasonable and prudent alternative. In a Biological Opinion on the <br />Muddy Creek Project of the Colorado River Water Conservation District issued <br />in February 1990. the Service concluded that progress under the Recovery <br />Program had not been sufficient and that an additional conservation measure <br />was necessary to offset the depletion impacts of the Muddy Creek Project. The <br />