My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01709
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01709
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/3/1985
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />APPENDIX <br /> <br />C <br />STATE OF COLORI\DO <br />- <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 666-3441 <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />Richard D. lamm <br />Covernor <br />). William McDonald <br />Director <br />David W. Walker <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />TO: Members, CWCB <br /> <br />FROM: Bill McDonald <br /> <br />DATE: April 29, 1985 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 9b, May 3, 1985, Board Meeting-- <br />Endangered Species Issues, Colorado River Fishes <br /> <br />The Steering Committee for the Upper Colorado River effort <br />is meeting on May 1. Although several presentations on key <br />issues are on the agenda, no materials have been made available <br />in advance of the meeting. Thus, I will have to orally brief the <br />Board on the outcome of this meeting. <br /> <br />In a related matter, the environmental community has, for <br />the first time, committed some of its thoughts to paper. In the <br />enclosed letter to David Getches, note especially item numbered 1 <br />on page 2. As noted there, issues concerning both section 7 <br />consultations and recovery plans are under consideration. <br /> <br />Indeed, when this effort was initiated it was focused on <br />issues concerning the section 7 consultation process and the <br />requirement for reasonable and prudent alternatives if a project <br />was found to be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of <br />an endangerd species. Over the past several months, the scope of <br />the effort has been implicitly expanded to deal with the recovery <br />of the endangered Colorado River fish species. <br /> <br />While the development and implementation of a recovery plan <br />is of importance to water users, we must not, I belive, lose <br />sight of the need to resolve problems with the section 7 <br />process at the same time. My report to the Board on May 3 will <br />focus on this issue in the context of the Steering Committee's <br />discussions on May I. <br /> <br />JWM/gl <br />Enclosure: as stated <br />cc: Jim Ruch <br />Jim Bennett <br /> <br />APPENDIX C <br /> <br />313 <br />ai/9b <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.