My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01706
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/2/1961
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2433 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'The hydroelect~ic power plants and trans- <br />mission lines authorized by this act to be <br />constructed, operated and maintained by the <br />Secretary - (speaking of the Secretary of the <br />Interior) - shall be operated in conjunction <br />with other federal power plants, present and <br />potential, so as to produce the greatest prac- <br />ticable amount of power and energy that can <br />be sold at firm power and energy rates . <br /> <br />Now there is nothing whatsoever in this law <br />or in any of the debate which preceded the passage <br />of this law which ever indicated that any part of <br />this transmission system would be constructed on a <br />private basis. The story is interesting as to how <br />the investor utility companies got their foot in <br />the door pertaining to this project. In 1960, and <br />I believe even preceding that, representations were <br />made to the United States Congress that it would <br />be foolish to duplicate existing transmission lines. <br />That if lines were already in existence - already <br />constructed by private utility companies - it would <br />be much cheaper to pool the joint resources, so to <br />speak, of the existing lines and that the federal <br />government would not have to build such lines. <br />Based upon that theory, the Appropriations Com- <br />mittee of the House of Representatives directed <br />the Bureau of Reclamation to consult with all in- <br />terested agencies in connection with the construc- <br />tion of these transmission lines. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Now the false premise upon which these argu- <br />ments were based is shown by the charts here. <br />These are ~ duplications of existing transmission <br />lines. These are proposed as new transmission <br />lines. I do not see how you can duplicate lines <br />which are not now in existence. So this fight was <br />predicated, and is still being predicated, upon a <br />false premise in its initial conception. <br /> <br />We have tried to review, as accurately as <br />possible, the various bits of information which <br />have been presented to us and which have been put <br />out for public consumption both by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and the investor utility companies. <br />The only interest of our staff, and I am sure the <br />only interest of the people of the State of Colorado, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.