Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A <br /> <br />proposed project was as much for public safety purposes as it <br /> <br />was for the repair and the rehabilitation for an existing <br /> <br />delivery system. Under those circumstances, he noted that it <br /> <br />was difficult to determine whether t~ proposal to line about <br /> <br /> <br />4,000 feet of the Uncompahgre Valley~~ Association canal <br /> <br /> <br />through the town of Olathe would serve any sIgnifIcant <br /> <br />purpose with respect to improving the delivery of irrigation <br /> <br />water. Considerable discussion ensued among members of the <br /> <br />Board concerning the desirability of obtaining additional <br /> <br />information about the effects of lining 4,000 feet of canal <br /> <br />on the reduction of leakage from the canal relative to the <br /> <br />total amount of leakage which occurts along the canal's 3fr- <br />mile length. The staff indicated that it did not have <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />available at this time information which would indicate the <br /> <br />relative significance of reducing leakage along the 4,000 <br />feet of the canal which is in the Town of Olathe. It being t/ <br /> <br />the consensus among Board members that such information was <br /> <br />desirable before the Board proceeded to act upon the request <br />rz/ <br />for a feasibility study, Mr. Vand,moer moved, seconded by <br /> <br />L--- .--- <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher, that the Board not act upon the request for <br /> <br />feasibility study until such time as the staff could provide <br /> <br />the requested information. There being no further <br /> <br />discussion, the motion passed on a voice vote. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald then asked Mr. Ioannides to review for the <br /> <br />Board the proposed feasibility study of the Lamar Canal and <br /> <br />Irrigation Company ...I1f'version~ructure (see Appendix F). <br />