Laserfiche WebLink
<br /><::> - <br />~ --- ,",.... <br /> <br />DAVIS, GRAHAM & STUBBS <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> <br />..JOHN M. SAYRE <br />892.437.1 <br /> <br />2600 COLOFlAOO NATIONAL BUIl.DING <br />950 SEVENTEENTI-l STREET <br />DENVER, COLORADO 80202 <br /> <br />TELEPHONE. 303.892-9400 <br />TE..ECOPIE:R 303-893-1379 <br />CA8l..E OAVGRAM, OE:NVE:R <br /> <br />SUITE 400 <br />1300 NINETEENTH STREET N. W. <br />WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 <br />TELEPHONE 202-223-9$12 <br />TELECOPIEFl 202.293.4794 <br /> <br />MAILING ADDRESS <br />POST OF"I""ICE: sox 185 <br />DENV:::R, COI.ORD.,OO 80201 <br /> <br />April 23, 1981 <br /> <br />Senator Fred Anderson <br />President <br />Colorado Senate <br />State Capitol <br />Denver, Colorado 30203 <br /> <br />Senator Maynard Yost <br />Chairman <br />Senate Agricultural Committee <br />State Capitol <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> <br />Re: Senate Bill 414, Minimum Stream Flows <br /> <br />Dear Senators Anderson and Yost: <br /> <br />The Directors of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy <br />District have expressed to you previously their strong support <br />for Senate Bill 414 as it left the Senate. That version would <br />have required the Colorado Water Conservation Board, in filing <br />for a minimum flow right or in defending such a right, to balance <br />water needs for the many beneficial uses to be made of water in <br />this state, including preservation of the natural ~nvironment <br />to a reasonable degree. Thus, the State would continue to have <br />a viable minimum stream flow program which fits into the Colorado <br />doctrine of prior appropriations. <br /> <br />As leaders in the field of water legislation, you will <br />recall that the minimum stream flow law was passed with the express <br />intention of recognizing that preservation of the environment to <br />a reasonable degree is a beneficial use of water. Each water right <br />of the Colorado Water Conservation Board obtained for this purpose <br />takes ,its place within the priority system as a junior right, so <br />that the exercise of senior conditional and absolute water rights <br />is not disturbed. <br /> <br />Uhder Colorado water law, any senior right must be <br />observed by a junior. However, when any water rights holder pro- <br />poses a change of water right which materially injures any other <br />water right, including injury to a junior right by a senior's <br />change in point of diversion, or use or time, place or extent <br />of use, material injury to all other rights must be avoided or <br />rectified. C.R.S. 1973, 37-92-3050), (4), (5), and (8); 37-8-120; <br />Hallenbeck ~. Granby Ditch and Reservoir Company, 144 Colo. 485, <br />495-496, 357 P.2d 358 (1960). <br />