My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01702
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01702
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/26/2001
Description
ISF Section - Statements of Opposition - Case No. 5-00CW284, City of Aspen
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />123 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Consent Agenda Item 21 <br />Case No. 5-00CW284; City of Aspen <br /> <br />Application Swnnuuy <br /> <br />This is an application for water rights for a maximum of 350 cfs for boating (including kayaking, <br />rafting, and canoeing) and general recreational uses on the Roaring Fod<: River, near the Town of <br />Aspen (see attached map). The Applicant has constructed a diversion that channels the Roaring <br />Fod<: River for a distance of 800 feet, and provides "a series of drops in the channel to enhance the <br />recreational experience." <br /> <br />CWCB Aopronriations <br /> <br />The Board holds an instream flow water right for the Roaring Fork River in the amount of32 cfs <br />with an appropriation date of 1/14/76. <br /> <br />Potential for Iniury <br /> <br />No entity, other than the Board shall be granted a decree adjudicating a right to water or interests <br />in water for instream flows in a stream channel between specific points for any purpose <br />whatsoever. This application may violate this statutory requirement. In addition, this application <br />may cause injury to the Board's Roaring Fork River instream flow water rights. <br /> <br />e Other Obiectors <br /> <br />The other objectors in this case are: the State and Division Engineers; Helen Stone; the Twin Lakes <br />Reservoir and Canal Co.; and Trout Unlimited. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />L:\WCTRANSISECC'lCas. Filos\2000\500CW284_mom,doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.