Laserfiche WebLink
<br />biological and hydrological value the only reasonable source of water available for this project is the <br />Blue River. S.G. Company considered the alternative of ceasing diversions into the <br />Oxbow/Floodplain Fish Habitat Improvements should such diversions reduce the flow of the Blue <br />River below the decreed ISF amount. S.G. Company has concluded that that alternative is not <br />reasonable from an environmental perspective because it would substantially reduce the benefits to <br />the environment and aquatic biota of the Blue River that are supported by the Oxbow/Floodplain <br />Fish Habitat Improvements. That alternative is also not feasible from an economic perspective <br />because it would substantially reduce the economic value of the Oxbow/Floodplain Fish Habitat <br />Improvements to the point where construction and long-term operation and maintenance of the <br />project would not be feasible. Accordingly, S.G. Company has concluded that no other reasonable <br />alternative exists to provide full protection to the ISF. The mitigation proposed herein will allow <br />the diversion of water to the Oxbow/Floodplain Fish Habitat Improvements while continuing to <br />preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. <br /> <br />Scientific Justification for the Proposed Mitigation: <br /> <br />Overview: <br /> <br />The Blue River Fish Habitat Improvements were based on a professional assessment, design, and <br />permitting process. Queen of the River Consultants completed a representative fluvial assessment <br />of the Blue River in 1999 that included development of a database on channel morphology, flow <br />estimation, trout habitat assessment, quantitative fisheries data, quantitative macroinvertebrate data, <br />stream health estimation based on biotic condition indices, and a review of historic flow information <br />for the Blue River. The purpose of this initial analysis was to provide a definition of existing <br />conditions, to provide a database to compare changes after restoration was completed and to <br />demonstrate how the proposed mitigation will enable the CWCB to continue to preserve and <br />improve the natural environment of the affected stream to a reasonable degree in spite of the <br />potential injury from diversion into the Oxbow/Floodplain Fish Habitat Improvements. The results <br />of the 1999 analysis were as follows: <br /> <br />Results of Pre-Restoration Samplin2: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Length of channel- 18,500' <br />Channel Types- C3c, F3 <br />Bankfull Widths- 100-133' <br />Bankfull Mean Depths- 1.6-3.3' <br />Bankfull Max Depths- 2.09-3.46' <br />Width/Depth Ratios- 37.73-60.18 <br />Flood Prone Widths- 136.8-376.0' <br />Entrenchment Ratios-1.l-3.0 <br />Channel Stability Ratings- fair-good <br />Trout Habitat Ratings- fair <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />'\ <br /> <br />(~ <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />