My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01660
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01660
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:00:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
10/14/1954
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />lVIr. Dutcher: <br /> <br />lVIr. Bai ley: <br /> <br />Mr. Dutcher: <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford: <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: <br /> <br />Mr. Pughe: <br /> <br />IVIr. Crawford: <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: <br /> <br />462 <br /> <br />"Do you anticipate that this matter should be <br />delaYed and future consideration be given to it <br />by members of this Board?" <br /> <br />"I think that if we can work out something it should <br />be done. What do you think about waiting until <br />after election and then have the Congressmen <br />elected come in and explain their views?" <br /> <br />"I think all interested parties should be heard <br />at length. I would offer this motion; that this <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board reconvene some- <br />time after election, the latter part of November <br />or early December, for the purpose of considering <br />the possible solution of intra-state problems in <br />Colorado pertaining to the Colorado River Storage <br />Project Bill, at which time all interested people, <br />organizations and groups on both sides of the <br />slope be notified so that they can have an oppor- <br />tunity to present their views." <br /> <br />"I second that Motion." <br /> <br />"Any remarks on this motion? All in favor of the <br />motion signify by saying aye." Motion unanimously <br />carried." <br /> <br />~I think it is an obligation on our part to get <br />the two slopes to agree. We should make an <br />attempt to do so." <br /> <br />"If we can get the three projects, Glen Canyon, <br />Echo Park and Curecanti, authorized we will be <br />able to work out the over-all picture. I think <br />the thing to do is get the Bill drawn up as we <br />want it." <br /> <br />"The Legislation Committee was to function until <br />an agreement was reached?" <br /> <br />"Yes." <br /> <br />Meeting recessed at 11:15 A.M., to reconvene at a later date. <br /> <br />Vice Chairman <br /> <br />~ ~ <br />~e ary . <br /> <br />Asst. Secretary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.