My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01635
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01635
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:04:44 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:59:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/26/1945
Description
Table of Contents and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />l;or~ <br />~ura <br />l;i~ <br />cipi <br />1'1' <br />.he <br />al <br />dO'lm <br /> <br />3 ori <br />it so~ <br />0- <br />in <br />are <br />ted b <br />r the <br />,e Re- <br /> <br />River <br />Can~ <br /> <br />. <br />e~onl <br />reau <br /> <br />iIlual <br />.Yeet) <br /> <br />)() <br />)0 <br />)() <br />)0 <br />)0 <br />DO <br />DO <br />DO* <br /> <br />.at I <br /> <br />(1) The word "depleted" here refers to natural losses, sinoe by <br />definition there were no man-made "depletions" under virgin oonditione, <br />and might better read "reduoed" or "diminished." <br /> <br />(2) A "growing stre8.lll'" down to the Blaok Canyon seotion does <br />not mean that natural losses are absent above that point. or Dlay be ignor- <br />edas in the Report. On the contrary it means only that inflows to the <br />main river. or contributions from tributary streams and areas. are great- <br />er in 'amount than the quantities of water lost in oonveyanoe. Similarly. <br />a losing river in the desert region does not mean that there were no <br />tributary oontributions under virgin oondi tions. or that they may be dis- <br />regraded. Instead, it means that natural 'losses frOll\ the main-river' <br />ohannels _re greater in amount than the tributary inflows (exoept at <br />times of flood). <br /> <br />(3) With "virgin 1'10"8" of 2,282,000 aore-feet at Phoenix and <br />1,271,000 acre feet at Dane, the conveyance loss would be 1,011.000 aore <br />feet plu& all the virgin-tributary inflow, to the river section. <br /> <br />(4) The indioated net gain from Lee Ferry to le.guna Dam, ao- <br />cording to the above table, is leO.OOO acre feet, Since the contribu- <br />tions reported fram Little Colorado and Virgin Rivers together emount to <br />648,000 acre feet, the table implies that natural losses under virgin <br />oonditions Vlere 468,000 acre feet. Colorado questions; the accuraoy of <br />the estimates for the two reported tributaries. and says that misoellane- <br />ous tributary drainage areas were ignored. Under so-called virgin oondi- <br />tions the tributary o ontributions, between Lee Ferry and Laguna DIllll (as <br />estimated by ColoradO engineers) averaged 495.000 aore feet from the Little <br />Colorado River, 392,000 aore feet fram the Virgin River, 413.000 acre feet <br />from miscellaneous drainages between Lee Ferry and Boulder Dam, and 200,000 <br />acre feet from miscellaneous streams (including'~t!~s River) and areas <br />between Boulder Dam and Laguna Dam. Assuming that -total figure of 1.500.000 <br />acre feet, of the net gain between Lee Ferry and Laguna Dam'is 180.000 aore <br />feet. as shoVltl in the above table. the natural conveyanoe lose would aver- <br />_.~age 1,320,000 acre feet annually along that river section under virgin <br />- conditions. <br /> <br />(5) Fran the instances above mentioned it is apparent that <br />natural conveyance losses in the Colorado River Basin involve substantial <br />quantities of water, and it seeme self-evident that such losses under so- <br />ee.lled "virgin conditions," when stre8lllflcms were maximum arid ...holly un- <br />regulated, woul~ have been greater than thoee observed and calculated <br />from reoords during the historic period. Colorado suggests that estimates <br />'of natural losses should be made by the Bureau of Reolam6tion, and sh ould <br />appear in the Report. oovering so-called virgin conditions. cr the oondi- <br />tions of the period of record, or both. As estimated by Colorado engi- <br />neers during the period 1908-1942 (...hen man-made depletions averaged <br />1,952,000 acre feet per year above Lee Ferry. and 2,911,000 acre feet be- <br />low Lee Ferry. and when the recorded fllm at the Internatioli Boundary <br />averaged 12.683,000 acre feet annually), the natural oonveyance loeses <br />averaged 870.000 acre feet above Lee Ferry, and 2,~.000 acre feet below <br />Lee Ferry. or totalled 3,;10,000 acre feet annually in the Colorado <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.