My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01614
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01614
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:04:27 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/23/2005
Description
ISF Section - Instream Flow Appropriations Contested Instream Flow Recommendations - Water Division 4
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Keith Catlin <br />March 18, 2005 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Executive Summary report relies on water measurements into the Paonia <br />Reservoir and out of the Paonia Reservoir to determine Williams Creek .95 stream flow. <br />Deep Creek also flows into Paonia Reservoir and it is not measured. With Williams <br />Creek and Deep Creek not measured, there is no way you can determine the Williams <br />Creek .95 miles flow. You have two unknown quantities flowing into the Paonia <br />Reservoir. In addition, the flow chart in the report is inaccurate even by the estimated <br />average stream flow in Williams Creek because Williams Creek cannot be correlated to <br />the Muddy Creek high and low flows. Williams Creek high flow is later in the summer <br />than the estimated stream flow chart. <br /> <br />I IUlderstand from the March 3, 2005 meeting in Hotchkiss, Colorado that any <br />instream flows will not affect our Project and/or Exchange water. We would never have <br />to use Exchange water for instream flows for any creeks and/or rivers. The Williams <br />Creek instream flow you are proposing would lock up our land for future development <br />and water decrees (i.e. any new wells, stock ponds, fish ponds, domestic uses). <br /> <br />I feel very strongly that the Williams Creek Report #CDOW 46377 is not accurate . <br />and therefore Williams Creek stream flow should not be approved. <br /> <br />Thank you for your interest and cooperation. If you have any questions or <br />concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. I would prefer that you respond to me at <br />P. O. Box 509, Helper, Utah; telephone 435-472-3357. The telephone number at The <br />Bear Ranch is 970-929-6220. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />The Bear Ranch <br />Richard N. Lee <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.