My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01594
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:04:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:59:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/27/2004
Description
ISF Section - Instream Flow Appropriations - Roubideau Creek
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Biological Data <br /> <br />The BLM has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported in the letter from BLM to the CWCB <br />"Fishery surveys indicate that the stream environment is presently in stable condition, and <br />supports a self-sustaining speckled dace fishery. The stream also provides sizable amounts of <br />spawning habitat for sensitive cool-water species including longnose sucker and round-tailed <br />chub. The quality of the fishery is improving, but is presently only in poor to fair condition <br />because of localized bank instability problems and lack of cover. Accordingly, it is important to <br />provide stream flows in order to prevent further stress on the fishery and to assist in the <br />rehabilitation of the fishery. (See BLM Fish Survey in Appendix B). <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantifY the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of field <br />data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, eight data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 <br />below. Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.