My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01589
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01589
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:04:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/11/1956
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />~54 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />GOV. JOHNSON: (Cont'd.l they can have your approval. I am <br />going to try and get a resolution through the <br />General Assembly also approving this alloca- <br />tion. This allocation is the whole thing I <br />want to be sure that it is in the bill and' <br />that it is in the bill without any strings. <br />When that is done, I will be perfectly satis- <br />fied but I want that formula in there without <br />strings. I want it definite and explicit and <br />written in the law. When that is done, so far <br />as I am concerned, the Upper Colorado River <br />development Plan before Congress will have my <br />full support." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />After further-discussion, Gov. JohnSon was excused from <br />the meeting. Mr. Bailey then called on Mr. Chilson to report <br />on the meetings at Cheyenne and Santa Fe. <br /> <br />MR. CHILSON: "I wish Mr. Delaney were here to report as <br />Commissioner for Colorado, but in his absence, <br />I think Mr. Crawford and I can cover it. <br /> <br />As the Governor has said, there was a meeting <br />in Cheyenne and following that, another meet- <br />ing in Santa Fe on January 5. <br /> <br />The situation about the division of the irri- <br />gation assistance or power credits, whatever <br />you want to call it, is that each state studies <br />whatever formula~is devised and determines <br />whether the state can live with it. I think <br />probably the result accomplished at Santa Fe <br />was the result of a proposal made by Mr. Delaney <br />at the Cheyenne meeting which was that the <br />Central Utah Project be separated from the <br />other projects and set up in a separate cate- <br />gory and that all revenues from the Central <br />Utah Project would go into a separate fund and <br />would be used for payment of the Central Utah <br />Project. <br /> <br />The reason Mr. Delaney did that was because <br />according to his figures, Utah could live--it <br />could construct its projects--under division <br />of the power credits according to the division <br />of water to' the compact, that is, 51.75 percent <br />to Colorado, and so on. Mr. Delaney also, in <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.