My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01589
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01589
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:04:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/11/1956
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br />-5'48 <br /> <br />MINUTES OF <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />MEETING <br /> <br />January 11, 1956 <br />Parisian Room, Argonaut Hotel <br />Denver, Colorado <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The meeting was'called to order at 9:30 A.M. by. <br />Vice Chairman, G~orge J. Bailey. <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey announced that Mr. Harold Roberts was <br />unable to attend and, by letter dated January 9, had <br />designated John M. Dickson as his proxy. According to <br />previous practice, Mr. Bailey stated, that proxy will be <br />recognized. <br /> <br />Inasmuch as Governor Edwin C. Johnson was present <br />the order of:busiriess was temporarily set aside so,that he <br />might discuss Item #7 of the Agenda. <br /> <br />7. Division of Upper Colorado River <br />8torage Project Revenues <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey then called on Governor Johnson. <br /> <br />GOV'. JOHNSON: "As you may know, the Upper Colorado River <br />Commission met in Cheyenne in December, and <br />then the meeting at Santa Fe"New Mexico, <br />~here they reconvened on Janury 5, 1956, to <br />consider a ma~ter of the utmost importance <br />to the State of Colorado; and that is the <br />allocation by Gongress of the power credits <br />that would acc~ue at Glen Canyon, principally, <br />and pernapq ~he other storage projects on the <br />Upper Colorado.River. The Commission reached <br />a unanimous decision at Santa Fe and their <br />decisidn has .been transmitted to the Congress. <br />I am very anxious for our delegation in <br />Congress to hear from this Board with respect <br />to the same matter. <br /> <br />I do not want to go back to history' too far, <br />but I should say this: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />l:., <br /> <br />;,-;; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.