My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01574
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:03:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:58:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/11/1981
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />reformulating the five participating projects which have been <br /> <br />authorized for construction and three additional west slope <br /> <br />projects which are in various stages of study (Yellow Jacket on <br /> <br />the White River, Dominguez on the Gunnison River, and Grand <br /> <br />Mesa on the North Fork of the Gunnison River). The resulting <br /> <br />report, which was strictly a "quick and dirty" effort, was <br /> <br />published in August, 1980. <br /> <br />Of the eight projects, it was found that no significant <br /> <br /> <br />opportunity existed to add an energy component to a project, <br /> <br />or increase that already planned for, except in the case of <br /> <br />the West Divide and Savory-Pothook. projects. This is because <br /> <br />three of the projects simply are not located in areas where <br />large, water consuming energy development will occur (San Miguel. <br /> <br />Fruitland Mesa, and Grand Mesa), while the other three have <br /> <br />~~ready been fOrmulated to include every conceivable energy <br /> <br />demand (Animas-LaPlata, Dominguez, which is a hydropower peaking <br /> <br />unit, and Yellow Jacket). The BjC ratios of the former three <br /> <br />remain well below 1.0, while the ratios for the latter three <br /> <br />are 1.2, 1.0, and 1.2, respectively. <br />With respect to the West Divide and Savory-Pothook projects, <br />it was determined that each project could develop more <br /> <br />,qater for <br /> <br />the energy industry, thereby increasing the BjC <br /> <br />ratio for each project to greater than 1.0. However, this was <br />accomplished for the Savory-pothook project by assuming that <br />better than half of the project's originally planned for irriga- <br />tion water supply would be reallocated to energy. More im- <br />portantly, even though the overall BjC ratio for each project <br /> <br />exceeded 1.0, the separable irrigation components of both <br />projects failed the tests of economic feasibility <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.