Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />~ <br />~~~"7:?J <br />,or.1V <br /> <br />~ <br />~~r~~ <br /> <br />-, <br />-' <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br /> <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver. Colorado 80203 <br />Phone (303) 866.3441 <br />FAX (303) 866-4474 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br /> <br />November 22, 1994 <br /> <br />James S. Lochhead <br />Executive Director. DNR <br /> <br />Daries C. Lile. P .E. <br />Director. ewCB <br /> <br />Ms. Carol DeAngelis <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />Grand Junction Projects Office <br />P.O. Box 60340 <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 <br /> <br />Ref: Aspinall Unit Operation Matrix <br /> <br />.'~ 'l Dear Carol: <br />.} <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board generally supports an operational philosophy for the <br />Aspinall Unit (formerly Curecanti Unit) which embraces the following concepts. The Board suggests <br />the following order of priority for satisfying as many of these c_oncepts as possible. <br /> <br />I) <br /> <br />Releases should be coordinated in a manner which continues to provide the amount of water <br />that has historically been available to water users downstream of the Aspinall Unit. Historic <br />releases have usually been sufficient to keep downstream water users whole except in severe <br />dry years. The Aspinall Unit should not place a direct call for water under its water rights <br />in a manner which violates the spirit and intent of the 60,000 acre f60t subordination described <br />in the 1959 Economic Justification Report for the Curecanti Unit of the Colorado River <br />Storage Project. <br /> <br />'. - <br />.- .." i <br />\,:,:".;..~./ <br /> <br />Releases should also be such that the 300 cfs 'minimum bypass flow for the Black Canyon <br />below the Gunnison Tunnel is satisfied. This bypass when added to the tributary inflows will <br />generally satisfy downstream water rights except during drought years. During drought years <br />releases should be increased to the extent possible to keep downstream water users whole, <br />particularly if releases to maintain 300 cfs for endangered fish below Redlands are made. In <br />1994, this required a Gunnison mainstem draft of between 550 and 600 cfs at the gage below <br />the Gunnison Tunnel. ProJ!iding ~t!ough_ ~~teJ_ out of Crystal to keep mainstem senior water <br />rights from impacting upstream juniors should be the top priority in developing the annual <br />operating plan. <br />