Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Agenda Item] 7f <br />May 22-23,2000 Board Meeting <br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />recommendations for the Gunnison River and Colorado River downstream of the <br />Gunnison confluence. These flow recommendations will be measured at the USGS <br />Gunnison River gage near Whitewater, Colorado and the USGS Colorado River gage <br />near Cisco, Utah. <br /> <br />Gunnison River Flow Recommendation near Grand Junction, Colorado <br /> <br />Hydrologic Category Peak flow, cfs Base Flows, cfs <br />Dry ~ 4,000 ~ 1,050, Jun - Aug; ~ 750, Sep - Feb <br />Moderately Dry ;:>: 7,000 ;:>: 1,050, Jun - Oct; ;:>: 750, Nov - Feb <br />Average Dry ;:>: 9,500 1,050 - 2,000, Jul-Feb <br />Average Wet ;:>: 12,500 1,050 - 2,000, Jul-Feb <br />Moderately Wet ~17,000 1,500 - 2,500, Jul-Feb <br />Wet ;:>: 22,500 1,500 - 2,500, Jul-Feb <br /> <br />Colorado River Flow Recommendation near Cisco, Utah <br /> <br />Hydrologic Category Peak flow, cfs Base Flows, cfs <br />Dry ;:>: 12,000 ;:>: 2,000, Jul- Aug <br />Moderately Dry ;:>: 20,000 3,000 - 4,000, Jul - Feb <br />Average Dry ;:>: 27,000 3,000 - 4,000, Jul - Feb <br />Average Wet ;:>: 35,000 3,500 - 4,500, Jul - Feb <br />Moderately Wet ;:>:43,000 3,500 - 4,500, Jul - Feb <br />Wet ;:>: 55,000 ~ 5,000 Aug - Feb <br /> <br />The duration of the peak flows is for 2-3 days and ramping rates out of Crystal Reservoir <br />vary between 300 to 500 cfs per day depending on volume. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />On May 2, 2000 a memorandum was sent to the FWS with the comments of the CWCB <br />on the draft final report. It is our understanding that the CWCB comments will be <br />incorporated where the FWS feels it is appropriate as well in a comment section. This <br />draft final report has just completed peer reviewed and is being revised. It is anticipated <br />that the final report will be completed in time for discussion by the Biology Committee at <br />their June meeting. <br /> <br />Based on our initial review, we are generally pleased that the flow recommendations are <br />tied to the climatic and hydrologic conditions that exist in the basin during any given year <br />rather than having a frequency specifically attached to them. However, we are concerned <br />that forcing uncontrolled spills during wet years is not good reservoir management and <br />could cause downstream flooding problems. Therefore, we have asked that the wet year <br />flow recommendations be eliminated and that flows simply be allowed to be whatever <br />happens to occur in those years. <br />