My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01559
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01559
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:03:10 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:57:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/17/1989
Description
Meeting Notes & Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(1) Without further Congressional action or approval <br />beyond the implementing legislation contemplated by <br />this agreement, monies could be expended by the <br />states for: <br /> <br />(a) 80 percent of the construction cost of the <br />Bonneville Unit I&D system. <br /> <br />(b) 80 percent of the construction cost of the <br />phase 2 facilities of the Animas-La Plata Project. <br /> <br />(c) 70 percent of the construction cost of any <br />project or projects benefitting the San Miguel <br />Water Conservancy District, Colorado, so long as <br />such project or projects are limited to a total <br />construction cost of $__ million ( price <br />levels); have not more than a total of AF of <br />annual yield from new or. enlarged storage- <br />reservoirs; and divert, store, and use waters only <br />from tributaries on the south side of the San <br />Miguel River lying between, and including, Fall <br />Creek and Dry Creek. <br /> <br />(d) 70 percent of'the construction cost of any <br />project or projects benefitting the West Divide <br />Water Conservancy District, Colorado, so long as <br />such project or projects are limited to a total <br />construction cost of $ million ( price <br />levels) and have not more than a total of AF <br />of annual yield from new or enlarged storage <br />reservoirs; provided that no storage reservoirs <br />could be constructed on the mainstems of the <br />Crystal, Roaring Fork, or Colorado Rivers. <br /> <br />(e) 70 percent of the construction cost of any <br />project or projects benefitting the Fruitland Mesa <br />Water Conservancy District, Colorado, so long as <br />such project or projects are limited to a total <br />construction cost of $__ million ( price <br />levels); have no mote than a total of ___ AF of <br />annual yield from new or enlarged storage <br />reservoirs; and divert, store, and use waters only <br />from Crystal, Cotton, and Mesa Creeks, from <br />Buckhorn and Long Gulches, and from the drainage <br />area above Gould ReGervoir (known as Onion Valley). <br /> <br />(f) 70 percent of the construction cost of the <br />Sandstone Project in Wyoming, which project will <br />develop waters tributary to the Little Snake River <br />for beneficial consumptive use, so long as the <br />project is constructed in accordance with all <br />applicable federal permits. <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.