Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CWCB Agenda Item 17.h., <br />November 23-24, 1998, <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />of the "aquatic resource". The attached table summarizes the evaluations that make up the <br />Assessment. All of the mainstem Arkansas from Leadville to the Kansas state line plus Fountain <br />Creek were assigned to Category 1, "in need ofrestoration". The Eagle, Blue, Colorado below <br />Glenwood, Dolores/San Juan, and Lower Gunnison were also placed in Category 1. The CRBSCP <br />will likely fare well under the Assessment since all existing project areas are in Category 1, <br />essentially by definition since impacts on national salinity standards was a criteria used for inclusion <br />in Category I. With over half of the 94 units being assigned to category 4, "insufficient data" its <br />not clear how useful the Assessment will be or how much reliance agencies will place on it. <br /> <br />BASIN HYDROLOGIC UNITS IN CATEGORY TOTAL <br /> UNITS <br /> CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 IN <br /> [degraded] [sustain] [pristine] [lack data] BASIN <br />North Platte 0 0 1 2 3 <br />South Platte 6 1 0 11 18 <br />Republican I 0 0 10 11 <br />Arkansas 5 0 0 10 15 <br />Cimmarron/Canadian 0 0 0 5 5 <br />Rio Grande 6 0 0 1 7 <br />Colorado 3 1 1 1 6 <br />Gunnison 2 1 1 2 6 <br />Dolores 3 I 0 1 5 <br />GreenlY arnpalWhite 2 3 2 2 9 <br />San Juan 3 1 0 4 8 <br />TOTAL 31 8 5 50 94 <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff makes the no recommendations, these items are informational only. <br /> <br />cc: David Robbins <br />David Holm <br />Jack Barnett <br />Dave Merritt <br /> <br /><:,'SIlMlULll\Ge;UtA1.'-lIO^RDM~I\"Jlllll1.WI'O <br />I""'''''''' No...,n;.l", 1')9' <br />