Laserfiche WebLink
<br />amount) ana asked Mr. McDonald to describe the problem <br />encountered .on the Dolores Project. Mr. McDonald summarized the <br />present situation as set forth in his March 1, 1983, memorandum <br />to the Board (Appendix E). In the memorandum it was indicated <br />that as a result of discussions over the past year among the <br />Bureau, the Dolores Water conservancy District and himself, a <br />favorable change in cost allocation procedure has been agreed to <br />by the BU~eau, which change reduces the M&I allocation but can be <br />effected only if the construction and financing of two single <br />purpose M~I features of the project--the pipeline from McPhee <br />Reservoir to Cortez and the small terminal storage reservoir at <br />Dove Creek--are taken over by the District. The District has <br />indicated its willingness to aqsume this obligation, subject to <br />availability of financing from the CWCB construction fund. <br /> <br />Mr. Fetcher then called on Messrs. Dave Herrick and <br />John Porter, Vice President and Manager, respectively, of the <br />District. Both individuals stron91y supported the procedure <br />agreed to and stressed its desirability and timeliness in order <br />that construction on the project can proceed uninterrupted. <br />Statements of support for the procedure were voiced by Board <br />Members Robbins, Kroeger and Vandemoer. Thereupon, Mr. Robbins <br />moved, seconded by Mr. Vandemoer, that the Board approve the <br />recommendation as stated in the Director's Report (see Appendix <br />E). The IlOtion was approved by unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />-6- <br />