My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01531
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:54 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:57:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/26/1957
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />661 <br /> <br />to your bill, Senator Gill, and we <br />would like to hear your views on <br />them. Will the secretary read the <br />motion covering these proposed amend- <br />ments?" <br /> <br />The motion covering the proposed amendments was <br />read and Senator Gill spoke briefly. He stated that the <br />important thing about this water question, to his mind, was <br />the matter of presumption by the Supreme Court. He agreed <br />to go along with the Farm Bureau Bill (Senate Bill No. 113) <br />as amended or his own bill with the proposed amendments. <br />He said he believed it was necessary to have more studies <br />made before any legislation of a permanent nature could be <br />written and passed. <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />SENATOR ROGERS: <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />SENATOR ROGERS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"Thank you, Senator. The legisla- <br />tion we. are considering this morning <br />has nothing to do with appropriations <br />at all. It is only attempting to set <br />up legislation to study critical areas. <br />Senator Rogers may we hear from you?" <br /> <br />"Thank you, gentlemen, for letting <br />me come before this Board. I haven't <br />seen the bill Senator Gill introduced <br />last night. Does it avoid the subject <br />of presumptions and does it provide <br />for local elections?" <br /> <br />"We have suggested that prOV1S1on <br />for advisory committees be inserted." <br /> <br />"This bill has no reference to pre- <br />sumptions." <br /> <br />"1 am a little confused and there- <br />fore don't feel that I can contribute <br />anything to your discussion. Legisla- <br />tion that would give us records in the <br />State Engineer's office, and would pro- <br />vide information whereby the State <br />Engineer and the Board could be guided <br />in determination of tentatively criti- <br />cal areas is what we need at this time. <br />How are you going to determine these <br />critical areas?" <br /> <br />"We are winding up, in a sense, with <br />only the beginning of a water code. At <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.