My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01512
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/26/1988
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />FAIRFIELD AND WOODS. P. C. <br /> <br />Honorable Duane Woodard <br />August 25, 1988 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Confirming the U. S. assumptions and conclusion is Robert <br />Milhous, for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service:1 <br /> <br />All of the [five] bankflow methods and the <br />effective discharge methods tend to assume that <br />existing streamflows are required to maintain the <br />channel in the future. The other methods are based on <br />observations that also tend to assume the status quo is <br />needed. <br /> <br />Yet even Mr. Milhous admits: <br /> <br />Is there any reason to believe that favorable condi- <br />tionsof flow are secured only by the existing flows?- <br />or can favorable conditions be secured by other <br />conditions? At present we do not address these <br />questions very well. (Id. at 107.) <br /> <br />We respectfully submit that even the language in Jesse, let <br />alone the additional legislative history attached to the briefs, <br />shows that the United states has been operating from incorrect <br />assumptions as to the crucial definition of "favorable conditions <br />of water flow." Common sense, and all the legislative history, <br />tells us that the "Land of Many Uses" was not intended by <br />Congress to be the primeval forest with water flows as they <br />existed before the white man arrived. otherwise, timbering, <br />mining, grazing, and the other uses of the forest, specifically <br />including water diversion works and rights-of-way for water <br />diversions and ditches could never have been allowed. <br /> <br />Jesse shows many assumptions the State's lawyers and <br />engineers should be using to reduce greatly any quantity of water <br />which the United states would obtain. The decree must find "the <br />purpose of the reservation would be entirelv defeated without the <br />claimed water. New Mexico, 438 U.S. at 700." (Jesse at 494; <br />emphasis in original.) <br /> <br />1 Fort Collins: Hydraulic Engineer, <br />"Determining Instream Flows For Flushing <br />Maintenance - A Review," in Proceedinqs of <br />Front Ranqe Branch. Hvdroloqv Davs, April <br />108. <br /> <br />Instream Flow Group, <br />of Fines and Channel <br />the sixth Annual AGU. <br />15-17, 1986, at page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.