My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01512
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/26/1988
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />~ <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />J. William McDonald <br />Director <br />David W. Walker <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />M~b1rs. CWCB <br />rmfl1 McDonald <br />DATE: August 15. 1988 <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 4. August 26. 1988. Board Meeting-- <br />Central Utah Project legislation <br /> <br />References <br /> <br />Please find enclosed my July 25 letter to the delegation <br />and Governor Romer's August 2 letter to Congressman Udall. <br /> <br />Status of Leqislation <br /> <br />Due to opposition from every quarter and both sides of the <br />aisle. the only thing which Utah was able to get out of the <br />House Interior and Insular Affairs Committee on August 10 was <br />an increase in the CRSP ceiling in an amount sufficient to <br />enable construction to proceed through FY 1990 on the M&I <br />features of the Bonneville Unit. Central Utah Project. Fish <br />and wildlife mitigation measures were limited to those already <br />scheduled by the Bureau of Reclamation pursuant to section 8 <br />of the 1956 CRSP Act. Since this drastically reduced bill did <br />not alter the manner in which power revenues are used and did <br />not alter section 8 fish and wildlife mitigation measures. I <br />advised our delegation that it was acceptable to us. <br /> <br />It is my understanding that the Utah senators will now <br />seek to run the same bill in the Senate as the House Committee <br />has reported out. I have advised our senators that I have no <br />objections to this. <br /> <br />Status of Neqotiations <br /> <br />Congressman Udall has made it clear that he will not <br />entertain a bill of the scope originally proposed by the <br />Central Utah Water Conservancy District until CRSP power <br />customers. the Upper Division states. and environmental <br />interests have had an opportunity to try to negotiate a <br />consensus bill. In turn. the Central Utah Water Conservancy <br />District now takes the position that this must be done by <br />mid-January. 1989. I have agreed to make a good faith effort <br />to accomplish this. <br /> <br />7911E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.