My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01501
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01501
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/26/2000
Description
ISF Section - Statements of Opposition - Case No. 4-99CW192, Sunnyside Development Corporation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />) <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Application Summary <br /> <br />Consent Agenda Item 4-I.a. <br />Case No. 4-99CWI92; Sunnyside Development Corporation <br /> <br />This is an application for a plan for augmentation, surface water rights and storage water rights <br />. on the San Miguel River in San Miguel County near Telluride (see attached map). The Applicant <br />is proposing to augment the depletions associated with the Sunnyside Well Nos. 3 and 4, the <br />Eastern Parcel Wells, the Remine Gallery Nos. I and 2, the Eisner Gallery No.1 and the Eider <br />Gallery No. l.with releases from Sunnyside Pond Nos. 1,2 and 3. <br /> <br />CWCB Appropriations <br /> <br />The Board has appropriated the following instream flow wlter rights that could be injured by this <br />application. <br /> <br />Case No. <br />4-84CW427 <br />4-84CW429 <br /> <br />Potential for Iniury <br /> <br />Stream <br />San Miguel River' <br />San Miguel River <br /> <br />Amount (cfs) <br />6.50 <br />20.00 <br /> <br />Appropriation Date <br />07/13/1984 <br />07/13/1984 <br /> <br />The Applicants' proposed plan for augmentation may not replace depletions to the Board's instream <br />flow water rights on the San Miguel River in the same time, location and amount as they have <br />historically oc<;urred. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Other Objectors <br /> <br />Other objectors in this case include Aldasoro Limited, the State and Division Engineers, Tri-State <br />Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. and the Town of Telluride. <br /> <br />C:\toddlCASE FILES\Case Files\499CW 192_ mem.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.