Laserfiche WebLink
<br />p. Recreational In-Channel Diversion. Alter the definition as suggested to <br />assure that the rules comport with the statute. <br />q. Staff. No changes. <br /> <br />4. Optional Pre-Application Process <br />Action: To amend as follows: Prior to submitting an application to water court or to the <br />Board, the Board encourages the applicant to meet with staff to discuss their <br />proposed RICD application and the procedure to be followed by the Board to <br />review the application. Staff will provide input regarding how the application <br />can meet the intent of the RICD rules. <br /> <br />5. Submissions Required From An Applicant <br />Action: No changes. <br /> <br />6. Required Findings <br />Action: Replace 'amount of water' with 'stream flow' on line two. <br /> <br />a. Delete the word 'factors'. <br />i. Should read "The amount and location of remaining <br />unappropriated Compact Entitlement waters in the basin in <br />question and at the RICD point of diversion". <br />ii. To amend as follows: The proximity of the RICD to the state line. <br />iii. No changes. <br />iv. No changes. <br />v. No changes. <br />vi. Delete. Repetitive to the heading of 7a. <br />b. Delete the word 'factors'. <br />i. No changes. <br />ii. The length of and efficiency of diversion of the proposed reach <br />required for the intended use. <br />Old iii. Delete. Repetitive to introductory language in rule 7. <br />New iii. No changes. <br />iv. No changes. <br />v. Remove availability portion of 7b as repetitive of the heading of <br />rule 7. <br />vi. No changes. <br />vii. Gone to Rule 7. <br /> <br />c. Delete the word 'factors'. <br />i. No changes. <br />ii. Delete the word 'readily'. <br />iii. No changes. <br /> <br />d. Delete the word 'factors'. <br />i. Replace 'subject' with 'proposed'. <br />ii. No changes. <br />iii. To read, 'Whether the RICD would negatively impact the natural <br />environment for which the ISF was decreed" <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />