BOARD01477 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I water districts. The problem comes up when you are administering a whole river. The present procedures for notice don't cover a basin. They cover that water district or may, in certain instances, cover one or two water districts but they don't cover the South Platte or the Arkansas from the head- waters to the state line. Another thing, a person might not ch~ge the point of diversion but he might go in there and change the place of use or the character of use. Under those provisions we have no statutory proceedings under the present law so that nobody would get notice. As we develop and as we get into this in more detail and as water gets scarcer, this is what causes the problems up and down these streams. So we have stayed with the basin concept and we have made provisions for administration so that the water commission- er's office which hasn't been changed in over 100 years and says nothing about wells whatsoever is going to be set aside as such and those water commissioners will be tied to the division engineer to carry out the basin concept. I I see no problems in working this out, Mr. Chairman. I am sure that there has been much thought given by people who received copies of this most recent draft. Senate Bill 81, the Water Right Determination Act of 1969, which has already been introduced, has this proposal so close - not questions of substance, I know Larry and I use sub- stance in these matters in pretty much the same way - it's methods. Some people have one idea as to how to do it and some another but I think we have a concensus on this and I would be hopeful that as long as Mr. Wel- born, who had responsibility for Senate Bill 81, and to achieve the unanimity which I am sure we can achieve, that I think you can get into too big of a group at this phase of