My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01476
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01476
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/16/2004
Description
ISF Section - Final Report to the Board re: Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forests - Pathfinder Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />April 2004 <br /> <br />19. Establish instream flow management objectives for watersheds on the <br />GMUG National Forests. <br /> <br />Issue: Intention in applyinl! the tool: <br />With over 3750 miles of The Forest Service should, in <br />perennial streams on GMUG cooperation with other resource <br />National Forest lands, the Forest management agencies and interest <br />Service does not have a clear groups, develop watershed priorities <br />prioritization process for for instream flow evaluations. The <br />determining which streams need Forest Service would develop criteria <br />instream flow protection or related to instream flow assessment <br />where there is insufficient methodology appropriate to meet its <br />instream flow under current instream flow needs and should <br />conditions to meet Forest ultimately develop instream flow <br />Service needs. recommendations for those streams <br /> where protection is needed and <br /> remediation strategies for those <br /> streams where there is currently <br /> insufficient instream flow. <br /> <br />20. Work cooperatively with local governments to establish Recreational In <br />Channel Diversion (RICD) on appropriate stream segments located on <br />National Forest lands. <br /> <br />Issne: ' <br /> <br />The RICD water rights can only <br />be held by local governmental <br />entities but these may protect or <br />enhance opportunities for <br />recreational instream flow <br />management on National Forest <br />lands. <br /> <br />- 24- <br /> <br />Intention in a I in the tool: <br />The Forest Service should consider <br />its recreational needs as well as <br />evaluate the instream flow <br />recreational potential of streams on <br />National Forest lands for possible <br />use by local governments as a RICD <br />facility. The Forest Service needs to <br />work cooperatively with those local <br />entities that may apply for a special- <br />use permit to operate and manage a <br />RICD facility on National Forest <br />lands since such use may meet public <br />recreational demands as well as <br />provide instream flow volumes that <br />may benefit other natural resource <br />values on National Forest lands. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.