My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01446
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01446
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:01:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:55:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/26/2000
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Endangered Fish Recovery Goals
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />meadow jumping mouse habitat and to see the county HCP process to completion.. Until the <br />Service establishes recovery goals with applicable crediting mechanisms, the state has no guarantee <br />its efforts will be taken into account for ESA compliance purposes. Accordingly, $200,000 of the <br />funds potentially allocated from FY 00-01 will be used for the Division of Wildlife (DOW) to <br />purchase options, with the consent of the Executive Director of the DNR, on qualified lands. The <br />options will be executed ifthe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service affords credit (to the state's <br />satisfaction for ESA purposes) in the context oflocal habitat conservation plans, applicable section <br />7 consultations, or potential delisting determinations. Should the Service fail to do so, or fail to <br />define and establish quantifiable recovery goals to the state's satisfaction, the DOW, with the <br />consent of the Executive Director of the DNR, may choose not to exercise those options, or transfer <br />them to another entity. An additional $50,000 will be matched with anticipated federal funds in an <br />attempt to complete the planning process for the affected counties. <br /> <br />OTHER DECLINING, AS YET UNLISTED SPECIES <br /> <br />In addition to the species that are the focal point of the cooperative, programmatic efforts <br />described above, there are a number of species in Colorado that are declining to the point that <br />listing under the Endangered Species Act is either imminent or contemplated in the future. <br />These species are often referred to as "candidate species." <br /> <br />These species are not yet under federal jurisdiction. The state, in cooperation with local <br />governments and private landowners, has initiated programs to help protect some ofthese <br />species, to manage them to a point at which listing may not be necessary. Iflisting does occur, <br />these programs are designed to give landowners, water users and others a degree of regulatory <br />certainty, and a framework or work plan for the eventual delisting of the species. <br /> <br />The Conservation of Aquatic Species program is directed primarily toward developing and <br />implementing conservation plans and agreements for aquatic species that are not currently listed as <br />threatened of endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act, but which may be listed if no <br />action is taken. The species benefiting include native fishes of the Arkansas and South Platte basins <br />and native cutthroat trout. <br /> <br />Anticipated Long term Costs: The long-term costs ofthis effort, as well as a full range of <br />sources to fund these costs, will be developed through a cooperative planning process. <br /> <br />Status of Activities and Expenditures from the HB 98-1006 Fund in FY 1999-2000: <br />For Arkansas River habitat easements, coordination among DOW staff and the Natural Resource <br />Conservation Service staff to ascertain roles, responsibilities and potential additional leveraging <br />strategies has occurred. Habitat ranking criteria, habitat values, and preferred or necessary <br />conservation easement attributes have been determined. These attributes focus on protection of <br />water quality and associated riparian vegetation. The Division currently is entering into <br />negotiations with two willing landowners on Big Sandy and S. Rush Creeks. <br /> <br />For native cutthroat trout, a DOW design engineer has been assigned this project and has <br />completed pre-engineering, on-site inspection, and detailed surveys of the Big Sandy and S. <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.