Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />Quantification of the amount of water deemed necessary to "preserve the natural environment to a <br />reasonable degree" is becoming more challenging as Colorado's ISF Program expands into areas of <br />greater water development pressure. This phenomenon became increasingly apparent last year when the <br />CWCB narrowly averted a lengthy contested hearing on its proposed rSF appropriations on Fourmile <br />Creek near the cities of Cripple Creek and Canon City. In addition, questions are also beginning to <br />surface concerning the level of environmental protection that is provided under Colorado's ISF Program. <br />For example, the Bureau of Land Management has proposed that an additional level of protection may <br />be required for the reaches of the San Miguel River slated for consideration by the Board in 2002. In <br />response to those questions and concerns, the CWCB staff has prepared the following recol1ll1lendations <br />regarding quantification of biologic rSF recol1ll1lendations. <br /> <br />SUl!l!estions for Develooinl! 'SF Recommendations on Cold Water Stream Reaches <br />The single transect R2CROSS methodology has been the Board's primary quantification method for <br />developing instream flow recol1ll1lendations on coldwater stream segments throughout the State of <br />Colorado. The single transect, R2CROSS method is advantageous because (1) data acquisition is much <br />more cost effective than other field-based methods, (2) the procedures are very easy to leam and <br />implement, and (3) data interpretation is simple. In addition, the CWCB staff believes that <br />recol1ll1lendations from field-based methods, like R2CROSS, are generally more representative of site- <br />specific stream conditions than office-based methods like Tennant which are based on stream hydrology <br />alone. The R2CROSS method has also been found to produce biologic flow recol1ll1lendations that are <br />very similar to, and more cost effective than, recol1ll1lendations developed from more data intensive <br />techniques (Nehring 1979). Finally, the hydraulic criteria that are used to develop R2CROSS-based <br />instream flow recommendations were specifically designed to protect the biologic flow needs of cold <br />water fish species within rime habitats (Nehring 1979). <br /> <br />However, as indicated previously, the Fourmile Creek ISF recommendations were quite contentious and <br />successful completion ofthese appropriations hinged on the development of biologic recol1ll1lendations that <br />were based on the average of multiple R2CROSS data sets. The use of multiple R2CROSS datasets <br />provided an opportunity for all participants in the ISF appropriation process to submit their data for <br />consideration in the development of the resulting recommendation. Based on the success of the Fourmile <br />Creek appropriation process, the CWCB staff recommends that the R2CROSS multiple transect, averaging <br />approach be adopted as the Board's "standard" biologic quantification procedure for controversial !SF <br />appropriations on coldwater streams. <br /> <br />In support of this recommendation, the CWCB staff suggests that determining the. amount of water <br />necessary to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree is similar to most other natural <br />resource sampling problems. Staff believes that R2CROSS provides an objective, repeatable methodology <br />to quantitY the unique flow requirements of individual stream reaches. Determining the number of samples <br />that are required to characterize the biologic requirements of a stream reach will be dependent on the <br />complexity of the habitats found within that particular stream segment. While characterization of the <br />biologic requirements of simple, uniform stream reaches may only require R2CROSS data from a single <br />transect, more complex stream reaches are likely to require data from several transects. Staff also believes <br />that the R2CROSS multiple transect averaging approach aids in the resolution of opposed ISF <br />appropriations because it allows all contesting parties to submit additional R2CROSS data for <br />consideration during the resolution process. <br /> <br />. While staffbelleves that the Board should adopt the single/multiple R2CROSS transect averaging approach <br />as it's "standard" biologic quantification procedure for ISF appropriations on coldwater streams, it also <br /> <br />2 <br />