Laserfiche WebLink
<br />If <br /> <br />40f18 '" <br /> <br />mentioned in Section S.5 of the Flaming Gorge Biological Opinion, re-operation . <br />of Flaming Gorge to achieve the flow recommendations for the Green River offset <br />language in Central Utah Project Biological Opinions and we would support <br />similar language and concepts be used in the Aspinall EIS to offset the conditions <br />in the Biological Opinions for the Dolores and Dallas Creek Projects. <br /> <br />Colorado appreciates the opportunity to comment on the formulation of the No Action <br />Alternative for this EIS and continues its commitment to assist in lhe Aspinall EIS <br />process and other Recovery Program actions. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br /> <br />Attachmenls: <br />A: Draft No Action Alternative with CWCB suggested changes <br />B: CWCB November 1994 letter regarding Aspinall operations <br />C: CWCB Board Memo dated March 10,2005 and presented by staff to Board members <br />on March 23, 2005 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finandng. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />