My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01421
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:01:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:54:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/13/2005
Description
WSP Section - Aspinall EIS - No Action Alternative Discussion
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />140fl8 <br /> <br />" <br />. <br /> <br />Cooperating agencies have met with the USBR regularly since November 2004 to discuss <br />topics including the following: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. Roles of lead agency and cooperating agencies <br />. Summary of Notice of Intent and purpose and need <br />. General EIS Schedule <br />. Scoping Resulls <br />. Hydrologic Modeling <br />. Public Involvement <br />. Discussion ofEIS No Action Alternalive and ESA environmental baseline <br />. Initial Ideas on alternatives <br /> <br />Recent discussions have focused on the No Action Alternative, ils definition, and which <br />current or future Aspinall operations should be included. It is clear from these <br />discussions that several fundamental and potentially controversial issues must be <br />addressed prior to development ofthe No Action Alternative and reasonable Action <br />Alternatives. <br /> <br />The most recent draft description of the No Action Allernative from the USBR is <br />included as attachment A at the end of this memo. Suggested changes bv CWCB staff <br />are highlighted in red. CWCB staff wishes to inform the Board of key issues and <br />requests their consideration of these matters. <br /> <br />Discussion of Sil!nificant Issues <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. Authorized purposes ofthe Aspinall Unit <br /> <br />The Aspinall Unit was authorized by the 1956 Colorado River Storage Project <br />(CRSP) Act. The 1956 Colorado River Storage Project Act (the "CRSP") provides: <br /> <br />In order to initiate the comprehensive development of the water resources of <br />the Upper Colorado River BasinJor the purposes, among others, of <br />regulating the flow of the Colorado River, storing water for beneficial <br />consumptive use, making it possible for the States of the Upper Basin to <br />utilize, consistently with the provisions of the Colorado River Compact, the <br />apportionments made to and among them in the Colorado River Compact and <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, respectively, providingfor the <br />reclamation of arid and semiarid land, for the control of floods, and for the <br />generation of hydroelectric power, as an incident of the foregoing purposes, <br />the Secretary of the Interior is authorized (I) to construct, operate, and <br />maintain the following initial units of the Colorado River storage project, <br />consisting of dams, reservoirs, power plants, transmission facilities and <br />appurtenant works: Wayne N. Aspinall, Flaming Gorge, Navajo (dam and <br />reservoir only), and Glen Canyon. . . . <br /> <br />The 1956 CRSP Act also provides in Section 8: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Financing. Stream and lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.