Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />.; <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />Under the proposed plan for augmentation, the Applicant can not augment out-of-priority <br />diversions that may occur to the Roaring Fork River upstream of its confluence with the <br />Fryingpan River during the non-irrigation season, November through April. Of the <br />augmented structures, only the Basalt RE-l School District Well will deplete the Roaring <br />Fork River upstream of the Fryingpan River confluence. The Applicant's engineering <br />report indicates that 48% of diversions from the Basalt RE-l Well will accrue to the <br />Roaring Fork River and 52% will accrue to the Fryingpan River. The CWCB staff has <br />proposed that the Applicant discontinue diversions at the Basalt RE-l School District Well <br />in September and rely on Basalt Wells 7 through 12 which can be augmented with releases <br />of water from Ruedi Reservoir. This condition would allow the Applicant to replace their <br />delayed pumping impacts at RE-l Well in October with historic irrigation season <br />consumptive use credits from an upstream source and the Board's instream flow water <br />right would be fully protected. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Applicant would prefer to continue diverting at the Basalt RE-l School District Well <br />through October. This would cause delayed pumping impacts to extend into the month of <br />November. The Applicant would utilize releases of water stored in Ruedi Reservoir to <br />augment these out-of-priority diversions and, therefore, the Fryingpan River and the <br />Roaring Fork River downstream of the Fryingpan River confluence would not be affected. <br />However, the Applicant estimates that these out-of-priority diversions could deplete a <br />2000-foot reach of the Roaring Fork River upstream of the Fryingpan River confluence <br />that could not be augmented with releases of water from Ruedi Reservoir. They also assert <br />that stream gage information suggests that the CWCB's instream flow water right has <br />always been exceeded during the month of November (see attached report). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The unaugmented diversions represent approximately 0.081% of the Board's Roaring Fork <br />instream flow water right during the month of November. The cumulative impact de <br />minimis impact to this stream reach in the winter months is currently 0.722%. <br /> <br />The Applicant plans to approach the Board and request that the CWCB authorize its staff <br />to enter into a pretrial resolution that is fully protective with the exception of allowing a de <br />minimis impact to a 2000-foot reach of its Roaring Fork River instream flow water right <br />during the month of November. The Applicant proposes the following language: <br /> <br />"During the month of November, the Applicant will not augment 48% of the <br />amount and rate of its delayed depletions resulting from October diversion through <br />the RE-l Well. The CWCB has determined that amount of these delayed <br />depletions during November are de minimis and the cumulative de minimis <br />amounts have not been reached within this segment of the Roaring Fork River <br />during the month of November." <br /> <br />5-90cw138 town of basalt deminimis request board memo <br /> <br />e <br />