Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2, The two different delineations serve two different purposes, The "existing conditions" <br />floodplain delineation depicts areas where the purchase of flood insurance is <br />mandatory, The "future conditions" floodplain delineation guides land use planning <br />and the design and implementation of flood protection facilities, as depicted in a <br />watershed master plan. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Current CWCB Position. as EXDressed in Rules and Rel!lllations for Desil!llation of FloodDlain <br />Studies <br />Rule 5,BJ. (Drainage Basin Conditions) of the Board's December II, 1987 Rules and Regulations <br />for the Designation and Approval of Floodplains and of Storm or Floodwater Runoff Channels in <br />Colorado states: <br /> <br />"The hydrologic analysis shall be based on drainage basin conditions that will <br />exist in the community at least 12 months following completion of the report... " <br /> <br />The document then addresses the subject of watershed urbanization by going on to state <br /> <br />".,.except if fUture urbanization of a basin is likely to occur, the hydrologic <br />analysis shall be based on foreseeable development in the basin. " <br /> <br />Rule 4. (Definitions) states: <br /> <br />"]7, 'Foreseeable development' means the potential fUture development oj or <br />changes in, the land uses that are likely to take place during the period of time <br />covered by a community's adopted master land use plan, or over a 20-year <br />period, whichever is longer, " <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Clearly the Board has gone on record as directing that those floodplain studies that are to be <br />designated and approved by the Board must consider the likelihood of future urbanization in the <br />watershed, The Board has also said that in those cases where such urbanization is "likely", floodplain <br />studies must take "foreseeable development" specifically into account in the preparation of hydrologic <br />analyses, <br /> <br />While the Board has directed that future urbanization must be considered in studying urbanizing <br />watersheds, it has not, however, stated a clear position on designating two separate sets of floodplain <br />delineations for the same stream reaches, even if the intent is to meet two different purposes. As was <br />expressed above, "existing conditions" analyses are performed for flood insurance purposes, These <br />documents are produced as part of a nationwide, federal program, They are legal documents used by <br />local officials, appraisers, lenders, realtors, and property owners. However, because they do not take <br />the future urbanization of watersheds into account, they are not the best documents for the purpose of <br />floodplain management, land use planning, and flood control master planning. The two different <br />purposes (floodplain management vs, flood insurance) call for two different analyses, a notion not <br />addressed by the Rules and Regulations. Tbis particular set of proposed Board actions is, therefore, <br />asking the Board to act beyond the explicit language included in the Rules and Regulations, <br /> <br />. <br />