My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01350
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01350
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:49 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Issues - Development of Opearations for Lakes Powell and Mead under Low Reservoir Conditions, including the Development of Lower Basin Shortage Criteria
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f" . . <br /> <br />December 12, 2005 <br />Page 14 of15 <br />Working Draft for Discussion <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Shortage Guidelines for the Operation of Lake Mead <br /> <br />Shortage declarations made by the Secretary would be triggered at Lake Mead <br />elevations so as to provide protection for future water deliveries to the Lower <br />Division States. One shortage strategy that has been considered is: <br /> <br />1. For Mead elevations between 1,075 finsl and 1,050 finsl, the <br />shortage reduction should be 400,000 acre-feet (at). <br />2. For Mead elevations between 1,050 finsl and 1,025 finsl, the <br />shortage reduction should be 500,000 af. <br />3. For Mead elevations beginning at elevation 1,025 finsl and below, <br />the shortage reduction should be 600,000 af. <br /> <br />The Lower Division States will also consider other trigger elevations and stepped <br />shortage reductions, as well as, the use of a protection or absolute protection <br />elevation level in Lake Mead in order to protect senior rights and for the <br />secondary benefit of maintaining use of the SNW A intakes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Declared shortages are to be shared proportionally with Mexico based on the <br />reduction in water deliveries from a normal condition. The shortage to be borne <br />by Mexico would be detennined in accordance with the 1944 treaty between the <br />United States and Mexico. Arizona and Nevada would proportionately share <br />shortages based on the provisions of the 1968 Colorado River Basin Project Act, <br />the terms of water delivery contracts, and the Nevada Interstate Banking <br />Agreement with the Arizona Water Banking Authority. A shortage sharing <br />agreement between Arizona and Nevada would determine the proportionate <br />reductions for each state. <br /> <br />Hydrologic conditions could necessitate reductions in excess ofthe maximum <br />reduction contained in the guidelines, for example 600,000 af. Such an event <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.